3ifbyw

This feels strangely relevant: https://rms.sexy/

I expected GOTO implemented with continuations. Very disappointing.

The object of science, in the final analysis, is the collection, evaluation, and‒if the stars align‒acceptance as truth of sufficiently explanatory evidence. It is laughable to assert that the astrologers have better assisted us in this endeavor, or even that their contributions are on a par with those of astronomers. If you cannot adopt this perspective, you are simply lost to logical discourse; what evidence could possibly be provided to you to convince you to value evidence?

For what it's worth, you might like to know that it's destruction which pride precedeth.[0]

0: http://biblehub.com/proverbs/16-18.htm

You would do well to heed Wikipedia's advice[0].

0: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_symbol

s/ a while/ever/

http://i.imgur.com/tcFHs14.png

Exactly an hour, in fact: https://github.com/wting/hackernews/blob/master/news.arc#L11...

Even more so with syntax highlighting: http://i.imgur.com/pDSUIb5.png

Go, Objective-C, Swift, and Visual Basic.

Really, Pygments did a hell of a job with it: https://github.com/threeifbywhiskey/pwnbs/blob/master/app.rb