HN user

16BitTons

617 karma

Shovel 16 Bit-tons and what do you get?

http://16bittons.posterous.com/

16BitTons at gmail.

Posts45
Comments33
View on HN
www.bettnet.com 13y ago

Social networks should be more like email, less like AOL

16BitTons
1pts0
gigasquidsoftware.com 13y ago

John McCarthy Papers – #1 How My Thermostat has Beliefs and Goals

16BitTons
3pts0
www.quora.com 13y ago

Winning the Claw Game

16BitTons
1pts0
www.howtospotapsychopath.com 14y ago

The Pulley Paradox

16BitTons
10pts1
www.dansdata.com 14y ago

Put your broken graphics card in the oven

16BitTons
2pts0
www.gnu.org 14y ago

Learning GNU Emacs while reading a manual

16BitTons
3pts1
www.iheartrobotics.com 14y ago

DIY Cleanroom (2010)

16BitTons
2pts0
apod.nasa.gov 14y ago

The scale of things

16BitTons
4pts0
www.foxnews.com 14y ago

Chromed: Google Demotes Itself in Its Own Searches

16BitTons
1pts0
berkeley.intel-research.net 14y ago

MIT On the Effectiveness of Aluminium Foil Helmets: An Empirical Study (2005)

16BitTons
3pts0
www.beeminder.com 14y ago

Beeminder: resolution tracking

16BitTons
2pts0
www.pcmag.com 14y ago

Is Google Chrome the New IE6?

16BitTons
17pts12
physics.aps.org 14y ago

Another Step Back for Wave-Particle Duality

16BitTons
1pts0
thai-flood-hacks.tumblr.com 14y ago

Hacking in a flood

16BitTons
3pts0
www.petapixel.com 14y ago

UK Teen Sentenced to Two Months in Jail for Snapping Courtroom Photo

16BitTons
1pts0
dataliberation.blogspot.com 14y ago

Data Liberation Blog

16BitTons
3pts0
www.stevepavlina.com 14y ago

Do It Now

16BitTons
71pts39
hosted.ap.org 14y ago

Woman, 74, claims government agents roughed her up over speck of moon dust

16BitTons
1pts0
www.foxnews.com 14y ago

Google Gadget Sales Lead to Microsoft Profits

16BitTons
1pts0
spectrum.ieee.org 14y ago

Radiation's Big Lie

16BitTons
1pts0
cheesycam.com 14y ago

Apsis Films: DIY Ring Light – WreathLight

16BitTons
1pts0
vimeo.com 14y ago

DIY 25$ Ring Light, no tools, no electrical skills needed

16BitTons
2pts0
web.mit.edu 14y ago

Fluoride-salt High-Temperature Reactor

16BitTons
3pts0
kianadavenportdialogues.blogspot.com 14y ago

How To Make Enemies: The Dangers of Self Publishing

16BitTons
1pts0
www.washingtonpost.com 14y ago

Google Wallet - tomorrow?

16BitTons
2pts0
online.wsj.com 14y ago

Ivar Giaever, 1973 physics Nobel Laureate, resigns

16BitTons
1pts0
css-tricks.com 14y ago

Creating a Web App -- from scratch

16BitTons
2pts0
arstechnica.com 14y ago

Science with Portal

16BitTons
25pts3
www.learnwithportals.com 14y ago

Learn with Portals (free copy at bottom)

16BitTons
2pts0
gmailblog.blogspot.com 14y ago

Free calls home from Gmail for all U.S. service members

16BitTons
3pts0

I remember feeling rather devastated when I found out that F<>MA and that energy and mass aren't really conserved. I think it was because I was trying to build a philosophy from studying physics, rather than just getting the equations down to pass the test.

>In fact, photons don't interact with each other at all.

They can. It's a non-classical concequence of Quantum Electrodynamics. If you are interested in the cross-sections, check out Berestetskii et al., 1982.

Yes, it is kind of amazing. I almost submitted it with the title "Does PCMag Know What Open Means?" but I decided that there was enough linkbait/troll in the material already. If nothing else, it does highlight that the concept of "open" is still poorly grasped even within technical circles.

For a long time, I thought of medical doctors as scientists. Then one day I realized they were technicians. I still have an enormous respect for them, but it did change my expectations.

I frequently put in extra time on projects without compensation. I care more about doing the job right than I do about squaring up a timesheet. It's not about my time being worthless, it's about my life being worthwhile.

>Google is a publicly traded company, their first duty is to their share holders.

I'm a shareholder. It's not much, but it does imply a tiny bit of ownership. And so, as a shareholder, I want Google to be totally righteous even at the risk of going bankrupt.

PakG1, you have a good point. Accusing someone of "selectively ignoring" evidence is suggesting the person is not seeking truth at all. In civil discourse, one owes a response. In uncivil discourse, then the opponent often isn't asking a real question and the answer doesn't need to take it seriously. I think PG was taking onan_barbarian's comment seriously and asking a sincere question.

For me, it's a cycle. I have trouble reading about something when I don't know WHY I am reading about it. If I 'do' first, then hit a wall, then read, then I really care about the reading because I've got skin in the game. Then I'm trying to solve a problem, which makes me happy.

How about something like Slashdot, where you can say why you are downvoting. +/-1 agree/disagree +/-1 thoughtful/usless

"Thank you for your thoughtful comment, but I disagree with your conclusion."

"I agree that 'Palin Rocks' but your comment adds nothing of interest to this discussion."

"I have claimed that Escape is one of the main functions of fairy-stories, and since I do not disapprove of them, it is plain that I do not accept the tone of scorn or pity with which 'Escape' is now so often used. Why should a man be scorned if, finding himself in prison, he tries to get out and go home? Or if he cannot do so, he thinks and talks about other topics than jailers and prison-walls?" — J.R.R. Tolkien

"I spent three days a week for 10 years educating myself in the public library, and it's better than college. People should educate themselves - you can get a complete education for no money. At the end of 10 years, I had read every book in the library and I'd written a thousand stories." -Ray Bradbury

"There are worse crimes than burning books. One of them is not reading them." -Ray Bradbury

To carry this too far, I think the analogy demands that language/grammar/punctuation are the ingredients. They end up in the customer's mouth. The tools, be it edlin or a pear peeler, only make the chief/writer's job easier. You have to use good ingredients, but the tools are a matter of efficiency.

Pi explained 15 years ago

Transcendental numbers translate into the real world just as well as any other Real number.[1]

You can't fabricate a string that is exactly Pi long anymore than you can fabricate a string that is exactly One long. But you can get as close to a transcendental number as you can to an algebraic number.

[1] I'm ignoring the trivial case.