0gs

wow OS-level undo would be a way cooler solution to this problem

my thing is kind of an Ollama competitor (surrogate?) too. more for prose/text planning, not so much for coding, at least the harness, but i'm sure someone could set it up to do that: github.com/0gsd/enough

yeah, borked on Chrome Android too. too bad, i want to see it!

people can do whatever they want! i just thought it was odd because i clicked on About Me wanting to figure out whose site it was and the answer was not there.

particularly love the use of diagram elbows as decorative flair

i'm sure this person is cool but it is insane to have an about me page that is that long, but make me have to click through to patreon to learn what their first and last names are

i wonder how many psychology today articles have been shared to hacker news ... my reason for posting is:

maybe computation IS the same thing as doubt? or at the very least, doubt is an ingredient that goes into making a computation. it sure feels similar to me.

have fable do the planning and explicitly tell it to farm out actual tasks to opus 4.8 and sonnet 5 depending on complexity. it works pretty well but yes the API switchover guessing game is no fun

i agree this is annoying but i guess i procrastinated the exact right amount of time today. my day just got a lot less anxious

it's pretty easy to make words that fast once you have the words written, fwiw. mostly breath control and there are things you think you could never do and you'll be doing it after a few times practicing. now writing the lyrics is a bit harder. twista is great

yeah, i kind of stretched the meaning of "real" there, i guess. i just meant software that is designed to accommodate users who are not me, and whom i don't even know.

kokoro is surprisingly great at nuance but it's tough to improve that last ~2% or so. kokoro + rvc is really great too; i use that for ELEMENT47, the LLM-centric comedy podcast i do that i wish more people would listen to. (e47.net , feel free to subscribe!)

you know what's next. CONSCIOUSNESS PSYCHOSIS and it's gonna be a wild one

yeah, i disagree. i think i am essentially ~non-technical and it is not difficult to build one-user applications at all. it's not even difficult to build "real" software!

ARE we still in the dorks-only phase? i am certainly a gigantic loser, but i am not sure i am the sort of dork being invoked and i have been doing and thinking about the exact same kinda stuff. i think the genie is out of the bottle or whatever

did jesse write this? i presume so but maybe hog bay has an anonymous forum

it's true. persuasion is the immoral core of marketing. personally i believe everyone should hate persuasion too but nobody will listen to me when i try to compel them!

fwiw, i built something simple like this into my harness thing (github.com/0gsd/enough). may not be complicated enough to do per application nowadays vs. needing a modularized outside solution, but it is certainly a good idea that seems to work!

sorry for the title joke. couldn't resist now that the fable crack is back

I think I probably did 12 whole books before I realized no one else would read them, or that if they did, I would feel guilty. some of them are really good though even knowing they are purely plan-based expression!

the nn dash remains the goat. the arg dash

i believe you meant something like US$9999 for the 512GB. otherwise, i'm going to feel like QUITE the fool for choosing the 96GB variant at the same price

sure! github.com/0gsd/enough ; enough.support has some FAQs. i did post a Show HN on it and i intend to do so again sooner than later haha

yeah, on a 96GB Mac Studio and Gemma+Qwen, it's definitely fully doable. fully doable but not really for coding on 16GB. but svelter models and cheaper (eventually) hardware are coming!

it's funny because i made this thing (called enough) that aims to make it easy for non-technical people to get up and running with local models quickly, but it is impossible to figure out how to break through the noise. every thread and comment like this breaks my heart a lil bit

... does this article presume that lots of people want MORE capitalism?

but there is not going to be an inherited and largely non-discardable codebase at every company, right?

and maybe not a team that looks anything like the teams that built and maintain the large codebases that are out there.

the distinction in this article makes all the sense in the world to me, and definitely helps as i try to figure out what term i use to describe my current status as a thing-producer, but part of why i just call myself nothing is it is entirely unclear to me what the new configurations of infra + product vision > actual v0.1.0 launch > new feature development "teamlines" are going to end up looking like.

if i had to guess, one such config might be "the 0.1% of vibe coders who took the HN crickets in response to their projects to figure out how to learn how to do what a product engineering team needs to do end to end to make a self-sustainable product."

(self being that one person, not the product itself)

skills can include python files that do whatever in subfolders. it's actually pretty crazy how much they can do for how blindly a lot of people import them. (i built basically this exact same thing a few months ago)

thank you! and good idea, i set up a cron job to put 5% of the catalog on sale each day :)

nothing earth-shattering. wanted a way to make it easier for agents with credit cards to source background music for their projects. think it'll work?