HN user

0dayz

1,039 karma
Posts11
Comments794
View on HN

It's more simple than that; lack of investment due to various factors among which some are due to regulations, but also because the lower ROI you get in the USA due to corporate culture, higher cost in general (wages, energy, resources, manufacturing, etc.), slower economic growth and so on.

Right, why did you feel the need to straw man me to somehow justify your victim complex?

You can cite me for when I said all arguments are FUD, or even that yours was.

And if your issue is that it's not ready, okay? That had nothing to do with my point.

So let me repeat, do you swear to never use a certain Linux kernel module because it has critical bugs? If yes okay good that is a most likely temporary technical argument so why spread FUD about it?

Technical as in there a precise and empirical reason for it such as a technological reason for it.

The bloat argument is perfectly suitable once you remove its derogatory meaning and instead say resource constraints such as when working in embedded.

If you mean that there are times systemd has a critical bug; sure the same way x11, kernel modules or drivers have critical bugs are annoying.

You can always point to where I said you are a neckbeard, so I do not get the "hard time" angle.

You can not like systemd, but the arguments for it is silly, and that is fine it's your machine and I don't care as long as people stop spreading FUD on such awful grounds.

Say in contrast with BTRFS or BcacheFS there are genuine issues with those and there are technical philosophical arguments (I want journaling, I do not want or need CoW features, snapshot? never heard of her).

To this day I have not found a single modern argument against systemd that is a technical one (I tried systemd but it does not support x which openrc does), instead it's these vague bike shed arguments (Unix philosophy, anti-centralization and "bloat" ).

I can't wrap my head around it, since those 3 are a "you" problem, systemd is just a service manager it's you who decide to use other systemd parts.

What does this have to do with the article?

And if religion is proving anything then it's that naivety is running alarmingly high as the absurd amount of grifting and deliberate misinterpretation is growing.

What excites me is that the kernel gets better not only for windows games but can also get benefits that can be more general purpose, such as what the article writes about: program able to wait for multiple events at once.

It will be interesting to see how native Linux games differ in what fancy under the hood kernel or syscall features they use.

That makes little sense if you know some basic political science, the EU is comprised of different political interest groups just like your country is.

Unless you literally belive everyone in the EU belive the exact same thing and there's zero disagreements what do ever.