Increasing head-parking interval from default on Western Digital drives (2014)

https://forums.freenas.org/index.php?threads/hacking-wd-greens-and-reds-with-wdidle3-exe.18171/

by walterbell • 11 years ago

23 14 11 years ago

forums.freenas.org

walterbell• 11 years ago

The WDIDLE3 executable can be found at http://support.wdc.com/product/download.asp?groupid=609&sid=... or bundled with a bootable DOS image on the Ultimate Boot CD, https://www.ultimatebootcd.com/

atap2• 11 years ago

  > To make problems even worse, that landing 
    zone is only rated for 250,000 to 350,000
    cycles or so.

I don't understand how a little orange plastic widget suffers damage or delivers damage to the drive heads during a head parking procedure.

It really doesn't seem like parking the drive heads would be an action that requires any kind of contact or friction between moving parts.

What's different about parking near the rim, instead of near the spindle?

Sanddancer• 11 years ago

Eliminating drag. Because the head uses air pressure to keep itself off the platter, that air is also going to be pressing against the drive, causing friction, and requiring the motor to work a bit harder. By parking away from the platter altogether, you're eliminating that source of drag and friction. Regarding the orange widget, the damage happens over hundreds of thousands of park and unpark cycles -- a little wobble and a little rubbing after each one, which will eventually be enough to get things out of alignment and thus, broken.

The difference between near the rim and near the spindle is that air pressure. If it's near the spindle, it still has that drag that's making the motor work harder. Near the rim, that pressure is gone.

atap2• 11 years ago

It just seems strange that there needs to be an orange widget to act as a "landing zone" at all.

Why not park the heads hanging in free space? Ostensibly the plastic widget is probably a guide rail to prevent head crashes, when the head unparks onto a platter spinning at full speed?

userbinator2• 11 years ago

It really doesn't seem like parking the drive heads would be an action that requires any kind of contact or friction between moving parts.

There is friction - between the head arm and the "load/unload ramp", as it's called. That's what lifts the heads off the platter when they're parked.

Here is an extreme close-up of what this looks like:

http://cdn1.goughlui.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/DSC_0016...

So a piece of metal rubs against a plastic ramp every time the head parks.

ChuckMcM• 11 years ago

Nice writeup Walter. One of the more useful things about a static landing zone is that the head isn't moving over a surface as it does on a traditional center landing zone. Both Seagate and WD drives have had issues with drives "kicking up" contaminants from the LZ which cause a head crash later as those contaminants migrate across the surface of the disk.

As for lifecycle, I'm with atap who questions the limits on this plastic. Basically there isn't anything to "wear out" as far as I can see on the landing zone.

kw71• 11 years ago

If there is any wear then I think it is microscopic. I had a Green disk die after 45000 hours of spin time, over 1.5 million load cycles. I could not visually see any defects on the loading ramp with a 5x lens. I think the failure mode of this WD10EACS was one head started going bad.

mirimir2• 11 years ago

What's the point of doing all of this in order to use desktop HDDs in servers? Why not just use WD RE4s?

steveh73• 11 years ago

They are cheaper, obviously

mirimir2• 11 years ago

Not really.

1 TB RE3: 48 USD[0]

1 TB RE4: 53 USD[1]

1 TB Green: 52 USD[2]

That's the cool thing about the RE line.

[0] http://www.amazon.com/Western-Digital-Cache-Enterprise-Drive...

[1] http://www.amazon.com/RE4-Enterprise-Hard-Drive-WD1003FBYX/d...

[2] http://www.amazon.com/Green-1TB-Desktop-Hard-Drive/dp/B006GD...

jleahy• 11 years ago

You can also use idle3-tools on Linux to do this, which saves having to reboot into DOS. It's even packaged for Debian/Ubuntu.

$ sudo apt-get install idle3-tools

$ sudo idle3ctl -s 138 /dev/sdx (for 300 seconds)

userbinator2• 11 years ago

5405 RPM? I'd like to see a source on that. I did a search, and was irritated to find only people on other websites parroting that number. The Wikipedia article has it, but the citation is WD's own spec sheet which doesn't mention any number.

Did someone take a non-contact digital tachometer to a (presumably dead) opened one and measure it? 5405 is only 0.093% more than 5400 and within the tolerance of the measuring device (and the HDD spindle motor also has its own rotational speed tolerance.)

Edit: found this benchmark using a software that appears to estimate spindle speed, and it basically shows it as being a 5400RPM drive:

http://www.hkepc.com/forum/archiver/?tid-1562968.html

Increasing head-parking interval from default on Western Digital drives (2014)

Related Stories