Why F# evangelism isn't working

http://ericsink.com/entries/fsharp_chasm.html

by mrry • 12 years ago

20 5 12 years ago

ericsink.com

_random_• 12 years ago

Why is it not working for me: C# = language and tools.

Where is my ReSharper/Roslyn for F#?

No, I am not going to use a plain text editor like nix guys.

No, I am not going to contribute to the open-source F# tools (Microsoft has some spare cash I think).

I don't care that "dude, F# compiler is already written in idiomatic F# in 10x less code"!

Maybe I am one of those lazy enterprise programmers, but how come do I love immutability, actor model and monads? I'll have my tools today and better language tomorrow with C# than exactly the opposite with F#.

PS: check this blog post to learn the full extent of the evangelistic lower-back burn (why, why aren't they coming to our elegant almost-purely-functional language !?): http://tomasp.net/blog/2014/csharp-6-released/index.html

Someone1234• 12 years ago

ReSharper will be redundant when Visual Studio 2015 is released. VS 2015 ships with many Resharper features built in, and the few that aren't will be trivially added via extensions utilising the new Roslyn APIs.

So expect to see that F# gap close substantially next year, regardless of what Jetbrains do.

CmonDev• 12 years ago

You are aware that Roslyn doesn't support F# nor has it anything to do with it, right?

grndn• 12 years ago

Did you notice the date on that C#6 post?

xvirk• 12 years ago

That's because F# is a Microsoft language and by thus it is limited to .NET world. But if we look at other ML languages such OCaml we can see that they're gaining popularity.

Why F# evangelism isn't working

Related Stories