Domain Name Registration and Geo DNS for Route 53

http://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/route-53-domain-reg-geo-route-price-drop/

by jeffbarr • 12 years ago

130 46 12 years ago

aws.amazon.com

This is a pretty interesting move. Google has started offering domain names [1] in beta, but with my experience with their support I don't plan on using it.

Pricing is a big part of domains for me and AWS pricing seems a bit high to me. I'm also not sure on if whois privacy is offered or included? If it was then the domain price would be fine. I noticed a Route53 zone is included, but is it included in the price or costs additional? I had a domain with low traffic and it was $6/year just for DNS hosted zone so if it was included in the domain price I would probably move all of my domains, though whois privacy is still a big concern.

For the past few years I've been moving to Hover ($15) and then lately Badger ($10) as it is cheaper, but they both have whois privacy bundled in with the domain price as I think it is an important service. I previously worked on and maintained a domain registrar so these hit pretty close to home, but I'm still not really happy with any solution. It seems Amazon's model of getting pricing lower didn't really come through with this new offering just comparing to the current market.

Could hosted email be the next big thing AWS introduces? With as many people who are frustrated by lack of good options (Google Apps) it could be an interesting next stage for AWS (App Hosting, Domain Registrations, and Email Hosting), then I don't know what will happen to traditional hosting providers, but I think they will be trying to figure out how to stay relevant.

[1] http://google.com/domains

colmmacc2• 12 years ago

whois protection is included;

http://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2014/07/31/amazon-...

"When you purchase new domains via Route 53, the service will automatically configure a Hosted Zone for each domain and ensure the privacy of your WHOIS record at no additional charge".

mgkimsal• 12 years ago

configuring the hosted zone... but do you get charged for it as well? i can't tell by that language.

EDIT: just tried to set one up - it looks like it's still an extra charge, so.. $12 for a .com plus minimum $6/year $18/year - kinda high if you don't need all the flexibility of the amazon platform. I don't see a lot of domain parkers taking them up on this.

wise_young_man2• 12 years ago

Good catch, thanks. I didn't see that when I was reading on my phone.

In that case I'm actually really excited about this then as the pricing seems pretty good with the registry price and ICANN domain fee plus the cost of maintaining a registrar and the WHOIS privacy I think I will be moving my domains.

gtaylor2• 12 years ago

Pricing is a big part of domains for me and AWS pricing seems a bit high to me

I suspect this is because of their partnership with Gandi to make this happen.

But really, we're only talking a few bucks either way. If you are using AWS, is it likely to matter whether you could find a domain name $2 cheaper somewhere else? You are paying more because not only can you register domains, you can manage them with a slick HTTP API that knows about a bunch of other AWS services.

ak217• 12 years ago

That, and you're typically also paying for a more expensive SSL certificate, much more expensive wildcard SSL cert, or much much more expensive EV or signing certificates.

Axsuul• 12 years ago

Also looking for something similar to what Google Apps had in the past with up to 50 free email accounts per domain.

tedchs3• 12 years ago

It includes email forwarding, which you can attach to gmail.com account.

tedchs3• 12 years ago

FYI, Google Domains includes customer support. I have been using it for a little while and it's really nice.

davidcollantes• 12 years ago

Is Google the registrar, or are they using GoDaddy or similar for it?

ademarre• 12 years ago

I had a domain with low traffic and it was $6/year just for DNS hosted zone

Amazon should give away free hosted DNS zones for Amazon-registered domains. The $0.50 per hosted zone per month doesn't scale down very well. I have a dozen domains I've accumulated for various projects I'll probably never finish. Their traffic is almost zero. I would much rather use Route 53 DNS for these domains, but at $6/month it's not worth it. I would seriously consider transferring domain registration from Gandi to AWS if it included free hosted zones.

EDIT: I didn't realize initially that Amazon is in fact partnering with Gandi, which doesn't change anything, but it's interesting.

ceejayoz3• 12 years ago

Now if they'd only offer the ability to automatically provision SSL certificates (and add them to ELBs) for the domains.

cyanbane• 12 years ago

My guess is that is phase 2 and not far behind (which is great for us all).

gtaylor2• 12 years ago

I sure hope so. You've got to figure that they'd undercut the ever living crap out of the other CAs, too.

iancarroll• 12 years ago

I doubt much would change, given Gandi (who supplies this) already gives out certificates.

Wildcards and/or unlimited certificates would certainly blow any other offering out of the water, though.

flyt• 12 years ago

Congrats to Gandi for being the underlying registrar that Amazon chose for the registration service! http://docs.aws.amazon.com/Route53/latest/DeveloperGuide/reg...

cmder• 12 years ago

Might as well just register domains at Gandi.

ceejayoz3• 12 years ago

For now, yes. In time, maybe not, as they add integrations into other bits like provisioning SSL for ELBs.

biot2• 12 years ago

Too bad it's Gandi, given their terrible business-hostile terms: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4970439#up_4970947

nly• 12 years ago

I'm not sure how those terms are business-hostile. Perhaps you could give a specific example.

opendais6• 12 years ago

GeoDNS actually makes Route 53 usable for me since I don't use AWS for hosting. Yay!

samcrawford2• 12 years ago

You may also want to check out nsone.net and rage4 if you're looking for a decent GeoDNS service. I've been using nsone.net for a couple of months now and apart from them suffering a couple of DDoS attacks, I cannot fault them.

opendais6• 12 years ago

nsone > $200/month at my usage level

rage4 > About triple Amazon's price [Euros > USD]

I'm uncertain why you feel they are competitive given Route 53's level of stability and the fact both of these services cost more [one considerably more if you only have 2 million DNS lookups / month]?

stevekemp2• 12 years ago

You don't necessarily need to use it though.

(I wrap around route53 at http://dns-api.com/ and don't yet support any kind of GeoDNS, or health-checks. They're not things users seem to want.)

opendais6• 12 years ago

Steve, it is a bit condescending to imply I don't know what I need for my use case.

aseidl• 12 years ago

It looks like prices are around the bulk D or E rates from Gandi (their upstream registrar). One notable exception is .io, which is currently $78 on AWS, but only $39 from Gandi (A rate).

Edit: Pricing list is available at: https://d32ze2gidvkk54.cloudfront.net/Amazon_Route_53_Domain...

ehPReth• 12 years ago

Gandi's E rates: https://www.gandi.net/domain/price/info?grid=E

mthoms• 12 years ago

Does this permit automated re-selling to users? I mean aside from the high(ish) price?

Edit: There does appear to be an API but it's still not clear if you can register on behalf of another individual...

moonlighter• 12 years ago

This is a great option for anyone who's planning to use Route53 for DNS anyway, and also for no other reason than having a clean and easy way to just buy domains without all up-sell crap you get from GoDaddy et al.

jasonkester• 12 years ago

Nice. The final piece of the puzzle that I didn't even realize was missing until reading this announcement.

When I spin up a new idea, step one is to register the domain with my normal $7/year registrar. But from that point forward it's all AWS except for the step of manually copying back the nameservers from Route 53.

Sure, this is a bit more expensive but it's a no brainer from a lot of perspectives. First, it's Amazon so there's no fear of flakines (even of the whimsical negligent sort that Google specializes in). They're certainly going to be more reliable than the guys I'm with now (not because my guys aren't reliable; they're just not Amazon). And naturally, there's the bonus of having everything in one place and tied together.

But mostly there's the silly psychological reason: I have to manually renew a few of my domains every once in a while, sending off my card details for a few hundred more of my precious dollars and feeling the pain. With Amazon it'd be completely different. They're already pulling a grand or so out of my account every month. It's just business expenses, so a bit extra for domains can get nicely lost in the noise.

I get the feeling I might be doing a bunch of copy/pasting in the near future. Let's hope they have a good migration tool.

nnx• 12 years ago

the final piece of the puzzle

One piece is still missing: SSL certificates from AWS.

driverdan• 12 years ago

Never register your domain with the same company / account you have your hosting under. If you keep them independent and something catastrophic happens to your servers you'll still be able point the domain(s) somewhere else. If AWS goes down and takes the control panel with it you won't be able to do anything with your domain.

colmmacc2• 12 years ago

Unfortunately the TTL settings on top-level zones are less than friendly if your goal is to withstand a DNS provider outage by changing the registration. The TTLs on NS records in the ".com" zone are two days long. So when you log in to your registrar of choice and change the delegation, it's still going to be two days before all resolvers are using your new choice. You can improve things for most resolvers, by lowering the NS TTLs in your child-zone (though few do), but about 10% of resolvers are "parent-centric" and you'll just have to wait the two days.

Using multiple providers, but using no more than two authoritative nameservers from each provider [1], is probably the way to go if your goal is to withstand a full-provider DNS outage. Unfortunately when you do that, you have to also consider that if DNS is your tool for handling day-to-day problems like web-server failures; then every time you need to make a DNS change, you need all of your providers to reflect it reliably and quickly.

Or put another way; using multiple providers can lower your day to day availability, because of the increased probability that at least one of your providers is slow to make changes when you need it.

Full disclosure: I work on Route 53.

[1] Most resolvers will try 3 different name servers before giving up, so if you have 3 or more from any one provider in can be ineffective.

brianbreslin• 12 years ago

So in essence could one programmatically register domains and then kite them all automatically using their API? Kiting is when squatters buy domains look at traffic over a few days and drop the domain before the 4 day refund period is over.

Domain Name Registration and Geo DNS for Route 53

Related Stories