Google I/O Registration 2014

http://stancarney.co/2014/04/google-io-registration-2014/

by jabsters • 12 years ago

73 31 12 years ago

toufka• 12 years ago

Reminds me of trying to get access to an old Hotline server. "The login is the eight word after 'summertime' on the last page of this link. Then, register for this service and the final word of the last paragraph of text is the password."

Either way, off-putting.

paulgb• 12 years ago

I think it had its intended goal; jabsters is exactly the kind of person I'd want at Google I/O (rather than someone just hoping for a discount on a new Nexus-whatever-they-give-away-this-time)

chinpokomon2• 12 years ago

It's hard to disagree without sounding like sour grapes. Last year I navigated the gauntlet while this year I signed up for the lottery the evening that they opened registration and didn't get selected. Discussion about possibly buried and hidden codes didn't surface until a couple of days after I'd already signed up.

Normally I love puzzles like this, but how many tickets could they have possibly given away with these codes? Compared with the total number of attendees, these were just a drop in the bucket. The overwhelming majority are simply going to be lottery winners. I fail to see how that is an improvement.

saregama2• 12 years ago

$900 bucks for a $350 phone ? :) I would say stop giving freebies and see if they still need a lottery..

jabsters• 12 years ago

Heh, Stan Carney is the man who deserves credit. I just posted a link to his blog ^^;

VonGuard• 12 years ago

Wow, Hotline FTW. I remember it well. It still exists, actually, with some old Mac OS servers out there, still. Problem is, the transfer protocol tops out at something like 50kb/ps or something that's fairly silly today, so it's not that great for modern large file transfers...

CountHackulus2• 12 years ago

Really? I remember it topping out much higher than 50k. I remember maxing my download speed at 800k. Must've been a low slots/high queue server.

CountHackulus2• 12 years ago

As someone who used to dabble in Hotline servers, you could make enough bank to pay for your internet with those "find this word" directions. Most people would do it if they really wanted the stuff on the server, or they could pay, or they could upload. Really, it became a self-sustaining system.

serge2k• 12 years ago

Shame I didn't have however many hours to waste looking for codes.

Oh well, I guess I will not spend 900 dollars on IO. No big loss either way.

suyash2• 12 years ago

I don't think it was a fair play again this year. Hiding url for the registration codes in images etc was not a very smart idea (although it was fun for a while), people hacked into it as well and some people got multiple codes while others got none.

Being an Android developer, I was disappointed, at least only registered developers should have been allowed in the lottery fist or better yet confirmed tickets.

Apple was much smarter and it allowed only registered iOS/OSX developers to sign up for the lottery.

mbernstein2• 12 years ago

Why only registered Android developers? There's a lot more to I/O (and Google) than just Android..

What do you mean by "hacked into it"? Do you mean people used wget -r on the developer docs and grep'd out codes to try?

suyash2• 12 years ago

"Why only registered Android developers? There's a lot more to I/O (and Google) than just Android.."

- Ofcourse, I was just eliciting a contrast to Apple's registration system for developers, Android dev was just 1 use case I'm pointing too.

"What do you mean by "hacked into it"? Do you mean people used wget -r on the developer docs and grep'd out codes to try?"

- Did you read the blog in full before asking this? In the blog, this is what Stan mentioned:

"By this time several HTTP crawlers had been created by individuals looking to secure a ticket to Google I/O ahead of today’s lottery. The crawlers used various tools and libraries to download images, web pages, and Youtube video annotations looking for more codes."

victortrac• 12 years ago

Google Code Jam has just started and so Google has the infrastructure and experience to handle large online coding contests. They should have just made Google I/O registration a simple programming exercise. Even a 10-minute in-browser exercise would have self-selected the right audience for I/O.

mbernstein2• 12 years ago

How do you get the design folks registered? You're assuming that every session is a developer based session.

just2n3• 12 years ago

Most are (easily > 90%), so why aren't a majority of the seats determined this way? With a quick glance of last year's sessions, I don't see anything that's design focused. Maybe technical designers who also do a bit of prototyping and developing would benefit, but that's a developer-centric role, it's a lot more than design anyway, and I'd expect such a person to be able to complete a simple programming challenge.

https://developers.google.com/events/io/sessions

just2n3• 12 years ago

Sounds fun on the surface... for people who have nothing better to do than to be looking at the sources of pages or reading over documentation that's rarely viewed, or watching random YouTube videos.

By the time this was made public and people were able to build scrapers, everything was already gone. Person A finds a ticket, tells his closest buddies so they can find them. Before it's made public knowledge that this happened, all of A and his friends and their friends have tickets. I don't see this as a particularly "good" approach. Why not just randomly pick several developers from GitHub/Google Code and say "here are 10 tickets, give them to your friends"?

I'd much rather a scavenger hunt be announced and all-inclusive of the community. I don't see how this is any better than FCFS or lottery. In fact, the lottery might be the worst of all. It's more likely to be diluted by non-technical people and encourages gaming by having as many employees sign up as possible in any given company, since there's no cost to register.

I don't understand what Google's goal is with I/O attendance.

Is this not one of the most technical conferences of the year? Highly technical talks and sessions for developers by developers. Looking over the talks at 2013 (https://developers.google.com/events/io/sessions, non-versioned link, so this might point at the 2014 sessions if your'e reading this in the future), everything seems to be developer oriented.

Why, then, doesn't participation require the ability to do something like complete a few simple randomized programming challenges to prove you're capable of benefiting from attendance? Google runs Code Jam, they easily have the infrastructure to do this on the scale that is needed for I/O. It's also certainly not necessary that every seat be given out this way, but why not 70-90%?

I'm happy that they put everything on YouTube and live stream the talks, so I (and everyone else who doesn't win the lottery) can still benefit, but if people are trying to get tickets just to get the toys Google gives out to attendees, I feel like there needs to be much more thought put into the selection process, or Google should just sell those outright to any developer who wants them. I really hate trying to saturate conference attendance by giving out exclusive toys, or toys ahead of market. It typically attracts the wrong people for the wrong reasons.

throwaway1979• 12 years ago

I don't understand what Google's goal is with I/O attendance.

Excitement. Buzz around the Android developer experience.

It is a fun conference. But lets be honest, if they stopped the freebies, would it garner the same interest from non-tech folks?

P.S. my personal opinions. I attended it once and had a fun time.

just2n3• 12 years ago

Does it need to? It's developer-oriented, not consumer-oriented. The "freebies" (really ahead of market or exclusive toys that you pay for, or get some kind of discount on) attract consumers, which is the problem.

If the goal is to have a place to show off all the stuff that's new in Android (or the new Google devices), that seems like a separate consumer-oriented conference. Or the big unveiling keynotes followed by the actual I/O, and the two should have separate attendances.

Look at games. There are many consumer-oriented events (BlizzCon, PAX, E3, CES, etc) to a few developer-oriented events (GDC). And the two don't generally overlap too much.

fernandotakai• 12 years ago

i would prefer if they stopped the freebies. tons of non-developers register for a conference that is basically designer towards developers.

Google I/O Registration 2014

Related Stories