Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc.

http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/limelight-networks-inc-v-akamai-technologies-inc/

by seliopou • 13 years ago

2 1 13 years ago

seliopou• 13 years ago

From the original petition:

Akamai holds a patent claiming a method involving redirecting requests for Internet content and selecting optimal servers. The Federal Circuit acknowledged that neither Limelight nor customers using Limelight’s service directly infringe Akamai’s patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) because no one performs all the steps of the patented method. App. 6a, 30a. The Federal Circuit nevertheless held that Limelight could be liable, under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), for inducing infringement if (1) it knew of Akamai’s patent; (2) it performed all but one of the steps of the method; (3) it induced its customers to perform the final step of the claimed method; and (4) the customers performed that step. App. 30a. The question presented is:

Whether the Federal Circuit erred in holding that a defendant may be held liable for inducing patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) even though no one has committed direct infringement under § 271(a).

Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc.

Related Stories