Updated YC Company Hosting Stats

http://arglebargle.posterous.com/updated-yc-company-hosting-stats

by brett • 17 years ago

93 50 17 years ago

arglebargle.posterous.com

carbon8• 17 years ago

Why only 1 on linode? Is there a reason?

KB• 17 years ago

I was just thinking the same thing. 14 on Slicehost and only 1 on Linode seems like an odd ratio considering the similarities of the services provided and price point.

Maybe its because Slicehost offers backups?

buro9• 17 years ago

I'm not YC, but yes backups differentiate for me.

Though I'm still itching to find something just like Slicehost but with gigabit on the private network.

medianama• 17 years ago

That's the power of branding..

axod3• 17 years ago

Surprised me as well. I don't know of a metric where slicehost beats linode.

rantfoil• 17 years ago

Slicehost support is top notch -- also getting started on a box is absurdly simple with PickledOnion's tutorials.

bretthoerner• 17 years ago

Disk, right? RAID 1+0 at Slicehost is pretty unique, afaik.

I'm not saying that makes them objectively better in every way, but it's just an answer to your non-question. ;)

mdasen• 17 years ago

There are several.

Slicehost has been doing Xen hosting longer. Linode is older, but they were using User Mode Linux (not nearly as good as Xen) for a long time. Slicehost got the mindshare by getting to Xen hosting first.

Slicehost is local to all their data centers. Whether in St Louis or Dallas/Ft Worth, their employees actually work there. Linode's employees all work in South Jersey, 2 hours from their Newark data center and inaccessible to their other data centers. Kinda indicates that they have other people setting up a lot of their stuff.

Linode is often out of stock or having limited stock. This might just be that Slicehost doesn't tell us how the sausage is made and Linode does.

Linode tops out at 2880MB. Slicehost offers instances going up to 15.5GB. That's a major difference if you want to try scaling up easily and there is a huge difference between trying to get your site to handle traffic on a 3GB server and a 15GB server.

Backups are a nice touch.

The Rackspace name lends a "they're the big game in town" to their service.

They aren't that much more expensive. Linode charges a constant $0.0555. . . per MB of RAM. At the 2GB level, Slicehost is charging $0.634 per MB of RAM. That means that if you were to get 2GB servers from each, the Slicehost would cost you $130 and the Linode would cost you $114. It is cheaper, but it isn't so significantly cheaper.

Slicehost can more easily upgrade your plan. Linode has to switch your box should you want to move plans. Often Slicehost can move plans while keeping you on the same box.

Now, none of that may matter to you. It doesn't to me and that's why I'm a Linode customer. However, for many these are considerations. If you're running a business, having instances top out at 3GB is a concern. Would you pay a 13% premium for Slicehost just for the knowledge that you can upgrade beyond 3GB of RAM should the need arise? If I had a person project where downtime for migration would be embarrassing, I would.

Likewise, some might care that the Slicehost people actually work in the area rather than colo-ing boxes with places like The Planet.

I'm very happy with Linode, but I can see why many would choose Slicehost.

axod3• 17 years ago

>> "They aren't that much more expensive"

Bandwidth overage on slicehost is .30/GB. On Linode it's .10/GB. That's a fairly massive difference.

jpwagner2• 17 years ago

http://journal.dedasys.com/2008/11/24/slicehost-vs-linode

zepolen2• 17 years ago

> trying to get your site to handle traffic on a 3GB server and a 15GB server.

I find that I always hit cpu limits way before memory becomes an issue.

jbr• 17 years ago

> Slicehost can more easily upgrade your plan. Linode has to switch your box should you want to move plans. Often Slicehost can move plans while keeping you on the same box.

I'm on slicehost, and when I upgraded ("resized") a slice, it was not a "live" operation. I don't know whether it's physically the same machine, but the old slice had to be shutdown, file system copied, and a new slice booted.

From the "Resize your slice" page:

Step 3: Current slice is shut down and migrated You will experience a downtime varying in proportion to fullness of the filesystem.

lsc2• 17 years ago

if you want more than 15GiB... use hardware. For less than half what a 16GiB slice sets you back, I'd be happy to rent you your own 8 core server with 32GiB ram.

jmtame• 17 years ago

Linode is great. Using them for Hacker News Directory (hndir.com) and several other sites.

tdavis2• 17 years ago

sniff

I miss you, Softlayer :(

anuraggoel• 17 years ago

Why did you switch to Rackspace?

tdavis2• 17 years ago

Monetary reasons.

webwright• 17 years ago

It'd be a nice touch to link to the sites in question. I'm ashamed to say that I didn't recognize all of the YC companies on that list! :-)

brett• 17 years ago

True. They're linked in the FAQ: http://ycombinator.com/faq.html

mc• 17 years ago

Thanks for compiling that list. I didn't know about SoftLayer.

I noticed the list mentions Justin.tv hosts itself. Aren't they built on Amazon EC2 and S3?

emmett2• 17 years ago

Your information is out of date. We outgrew EC2 a while ago.

ankhmoop• 17 years ago

Outgrew how?

drusenko• 17 years ago

From what I can tell, Justin.tv and us (Weebly) are the only ones on that list who own their own IP blocks

kvogt• 17 years ago

Justin.tv and Weebly run their own networks. We have BGP-speaking routers that announce our own IP address prefixes to the global internet routing table via multiple transit providers.

grandalf• 17 years ago

wow nobody using engineyard! I guess the YC stipend would only cover one month :)

dannyr2• 17 years ago

I wonder why no YC companies are on Google App Engine.

wheels• 17 years ago

It's only been 4 months since they announced commercial licensing. Before that you'd have been a nut to build your business on it. Pretty much any announced YC company started development more than 4 months back.

dangrover• 17 years ago

I know of at least one that is!

vlad• 17 years ago

You beat me to it. :)

pubbins• 17 years ago

Not a YC company but I have sites on Slicehost and FDC Servers. Slicehost was nice for setting up my first Linux server - now that I've done it, I'll be using FDC as it's hard to beat FDC for the price/bandwidth.

If you can stay under 3 TB/month 1and1 also has some decent servers for the money.

jpwagner2• 17 years ago

Interesting reviews at Web Hosting Geeks: http://webhostinggeeks.com/

*edit--damn no one likes sarcasm around here

quizbiz• 17 years ago

Why the url then? Seems a bit tongue and cheek.

mikeyur• 17 years ago

Does Mosso cloud mix into Rackspace? I've been quite happy with my Mosso Xen VPS.

I pay like $26/mo. for my 512MB VPS. It's $0.03/hr which is $21.90/mo. but you pay $0.22/GB out, and $0.08/GB in. I don't use a whole lot of bandwidth though.

edawerd3• 17 years ago

This might be a little bit off topic, but I've always thought that it could make some sense to have a YC colocation. With enough companies, it could be more cost-effective than everyone getting their own slicehost. Of course, there would be a ton of other headaches involved like backups, outages, etc, but a lot of YC companies seem to be doing just fine administering their own boxes in a colo. I know it wouldn't be for everyone, but maybe a standard stack of software/configuations could be readily available for new YC companies. We all seem to have had the same frustrations with configuring webservers, mail servers (ouch!), tweaking database servers, etc. It could be yet another benefit of joining the YC mafia =)

rdl• 17 years ago

I think an easier way to do this is for a forward-thinking hosting provider, colo, etc. in the bay area to offer discounted or free hosting to YC companies (free during the YC period, maybe not after); a few months of free hosting to have a shot at a successful site as customer would be more than worth it.

(alternatively, convertible debt)

Piggybacking on YC's selection process seems like a good business model in general.

edawerd3• 17 years ago

I think this would be a win-win for YC and the hosting provider. The startups would save a little bit of money, and the hosting provider would get a good amount of recurring revenue after the 3 months, since we are unlikely to migrate our servers after spending countless hours setting it up.

lsc2• 17 years ago

I have considered offering free hosting to YC companies. Most of them seem to be a bit, ah, brand conscious (thus going for slicehost over linode) so I haven't bothered to push the idea.

But yea, if any YC company needs free hosting (and really, hosting is so cheap these days that it's all pretty much free) I'd be happy to give it to them. I'm younger than linode, but I've been renting Xen VPSs since 2005, which makes me older than slicehost, I believe.

I'm not asking you to go exclusive or anything (in fact, I think that's a bad idea. don't host all your stuff with the same provider.)

That said, I'd be a little surprised if any of the YC companies have to pay for hosting. Many, many ISPs would be happy to give away a little bandwidth in exchange for some publicity.

ALee• 17 years ago

Before this, everyone was on AWS, did YC companies get a deal with Slicehost?

Updated YC Company Hosting Stats

Related Stories