Functional Programming Principles in Scala: Impressions and Statistics

http://docs.scala-lang.org/news/functional-programming-principles-in-scala-impressions-and-statistics.html

by Kopion • 14 years ago

80 16 14 years ago

pohl3• 14 years ago

This was a fantastic course, and I do hope they follow it up with an advanced one. I especially enjoyed how one submitted homework attempts with sbt, and how their unit tests encouraged one to repeatedly submit until a perfect score was obtained. I feel that I learned a lot.

I get the impression that this course lowered the threshold to exploring the functional paradigm for a lot of students who were aware of it but never took the time to do it on their own. Ten thousand new programmers in one language is no small achievement.

Who here wouldn't jump at the chance to join a MOOC on Haskell taught by Simpon Peyton Jones? Or Rich Hickey teaching Clojure?

I hope to see more learning resources like this in the future.

bmj4• 14 years ago

I'm in the middle of taking the course, and while I enjoy it, I wish the prerequisites mentioned the heavy emphasis on math. I don't have a CS degree, nor do I have a background in advanced maths, so I find myself struggling with the assignments and in-class exercises.

vassvdm• 14 years ago

hey bmj, you say you're taking the course now? My understanding is that this course is over - do you mean all the material is still available, including the corrections/grading and certificate-awarding system even though Odersky & team are no longer working on it behind the scenes?

kscaldef• 14 years ago

I'm a little confused by your comment, but as someone with an advanced math degree I might just not have noticed what you're referring to. Can you point out what in the course you felt involved a heavy emphasis on math?

rauljara2• 14 years ago

I don't want to take anything away from the quality of the teaching (which was quite high), but having completed a few courses at Coursera, I think a big reason the completion rate was so high was that it was simply nowhere near as much work as the other programming courses I have taken.

I'm not sure this is a bad thing at all. I loved the course, myself, and would jump at a chance to take the next one in the sequence. Given the web format, I think shorter, easier to master units of learning are probably the way to go, and this course's high completion rate supports that.

But when comparing it to other course's completion rates, you need to keep in mind that there simply wasn't that much to complete.

pohl3• 14 years ago

Out of curiosity, could you mention some specific Coursera courses that involved more programming work? I might want to check them out.

rauljara2• 14 years ago

Natural Language Processing (Dan Jurafsky, Chris Manning) was the one that took up the most time. I felt like to get a perfect score (which I got nowhere near close to) would have easily been 10+ hours per assignment (not to mention actually watching the lectures / quizzes). This may have been in part due to my own lack of background knowledge (up until coursera I was almost entirely self taught). But even Algorithms, Part I (Robert Sedgewick, Kevin Wayne) felt like it took at least twice as long to get through the quizzes + assignments as Odersky's class.

ryanbraganza• 14 years ago

Compilers had quite a lot of programming - https://www.coursera.org/course/compilers

smsm422• 14 years ago

I think this course was excellent. My main problem with most tutorials - especially on functional programming - is that I was totally unable to understand how one solves practical common tasks in language like Scala. The course helped me a lot with that. While I am still not a competent Scala programmer, I got a reasonable understanding how Scala works and how one should approach doing things in Scala.

Functional Programming Principles in Scala: Impressions and Statistics

Related Stories