The Coming Divide: AI-Native or Left Behind

https://danielmiessler.com/blog/ai-native-divide

by skeledrew • 27 days ago

6 8 27 days ago

Given the outsourcing of thinking, I’d argue that the author has got their book analogy the wrong way around.

skeledrew3• 27 days ago

It's the wrong way around if you think that people are[/should be?] seeking to think more (or something along those lines) about issues they encounter. It isn't if you think that people are seeking to offload yet another task, similar to automating away many other areas of life.

jazz9k• 27 days ago

"Talking to someone who reads 20–50 good books a year is nothing like talking to someone who hasn't read a book since school made them."

Most books are outdated, before they are released.

I read well over the amount text in 20-30 books from online content/non-books.

This idea is outdated and not a good indicator of someone who reads.

AI is just a tool. It's pretty obvious it's here to stay and if you don't start embracing it, you will be left behind.

BigTTYGothGF• 27 days ago

Most books are outdated, before they are released

What an odd thing to say.

thatoneengineer2• 27 days ago

I'm an early adopter of AI products myself, but I'm always disgusted when I hear this kind of case being made for them. It's fear-mongering, plain and simple. The cloud, mobile, even crypto sounded like "join us in this exciting new world" at their most hyped. Why does AI so often sound like "get on board or you'll be obsolete"?

If the author really is right, that we're heading for a world with a cutthroat binary divide between the adopters and the non-adopters, then I know in my gut which side I want to be on, and it's not his.

skeledrew3• 27 days ago

It's a simple logical proposition though. Either one is using AI in some way, or one isn't. And only those who use it can benefit from it. And we know that there are definitely benefits. Therefore those who avoid it will miss out on said benefits, ie "left behind".

thatoneengineer2• 27 days ago

You could have said that about any successful technology ever! But for some reason everyone is anxious to say it about AI while being extremely vague about the benefits. (This is especially funny in the mouth of VPs and the like: "we're not sure what AI means for us, but we urgently need to adopt it so we don't fall behind!") If you want me to get deeper into AI tell me what it'll do for me, don't try to scare me with vague FOMO.

The Coming Divide: AI-Native or Left Behind

Related Stories