Show HN: Free tool to see how much AI bots are costing your site

https://botcost.dev

by plaintosapp • 2 months ago

18 13 2 months ago

botcost.dev

len_chapaty2• 2 months ago

nice, how are you calculation the cost?

newscombinatorY• 2 months ago

Hopefully not by using another AI bot... ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

plaintosapp7• 2 months ago

Nope, pure JavaScript in your browser. No AI bots were harmed or employed in the making of this tool.

plaintosapp7• 2 months ago

Good question. The cost estimate uses two components:

1. Bandwidth: total bytes served to bots divided by 1GB, multiplied by $0.09/GB (AWS/Cloudflare blended average rate)

2. Compute: total bot requests divided by 1 million, multiplied by $0.40 (Vercel/Lambda average per million invocations)

Both rates are configurable assumptions — the real value is seeing the relative breakdown between bots and the order of magnitude of waste. Your actual cost depends on your specific hosting provider.

len_chapaty2• 2 months ago

Got it, makes sense. Worth noting intra-region vs inter-region transfer can differ a lot too. As a blended average for an order-of-magnitude estimate, this is really useful.

roysting• 2 months ago

Was that response written and/or auto-replied by AI?

plaintosapp7• 2 months ago

Also wrote up the background on Dev.to if anyone wants more context on how it works: [https://dev.to/plaintos_app_fd54e75a054e/i-built-a-free-tool...]

quinncom• 2 months ago

The article doesn't really get into the details. Does it analyze the user agent and compare it to a list of known bot user agents? What about all the bots that spoof user agent values – does it do something special to detect those?

plaintosapp7• 2 months ago

Yes exactly — it matches against a database of 18 known AI bot user agent tokens (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Bytespider etc.) plus their known IP ranges where available. GPTBot for example publishes its IP ranges officially so we can match on both UA and IP.

The spoofing problem is the hard one. Bots that fully spoof Chrome headers are invisible to any UA-based tool including this one. The honest answer is that BotCost catches the "polite" bots that identify themselves — which covers the major AI companies (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta) since they all self-identify. The truly malicious scrapers that spoof identities are a harder problem requiring behavioral analysis.

So it's accurate for what it is — catching known AI training and search crawlers — but not a complete bot detection solution.

nottorp• 2 months ago

I ran it on my personal domain that has just some kind of landing page and nothing else on it, and it's not advertised anywhere:

0% of traffic is non-human · <$0.01/yr projected

Well, 0% of traffic is AI bots. 99% of traffic is vulnerability scanners actually.

plaintosapp7• 2 months ago

Ha, that's a fair point — vulnerability scanners are a whole separate category I haven't tackled yet. BotCost is specifically focused on AI training and search crawlers right now (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Bytespider etc.) rather than security scanners.

Good news: 0% AI bot traffic on an unadvertised landing page makes sense — those bots tend to follow links and sitemaps. If you run it on a site with real content and traffic you'll likely see a different picture.

Vulnerability scanners on the other hand... that's a different problem worth solving too.

Show HN: Free tool to see how much AI bots are costing your site

Related Stories