Phusion Passenger Enterprise released

http://blog.phusion.nl/2012/08/01/phusion-passenger-enterprise-released/

by ninh • 14 years ago

52 33 14 years ago

blog.phusion.nl

Or go directly to https://www.phusionpassenger.com ! Excited to hear what you guys think about it.

tinco2• 14 years ago

If you think blog posts are boring you can skip to our awesome launch page here: https://phusionpassenger.com

We're excited to hear what you think about it.

bradleyland• 14 years ago

I really wish I had something more constructive to say, but I just want to tell you guys that I really appreciate the product you've developed and the philosophy behind it.

I've tried a lot of other app servers, and while there are a lot of great products out there, I didn't find any of them to match the ease of installation, configuration, and stability that Passenger provides.

I'm looking forward to being a paying customer. Congrats!

asg• 14 years ago

In general very nicely done, but the $4999 option with every detail negotiable seems a bit amateurish. "Lets throw a number and see what sticks"

Having said that, the intention is, I imagine, noble. You want to be, and be seen, to be flexible and willing to work with your customer. But I think the way its presented will come across as wishy-washy.

I like the design, thought it may be a little busy at times. But certainly eye catching.

Ruphin4• 14 years ago

The Deluxe option is there to indicate that we have special offerings for large volume customers. If your yearly license fee would surpass the $4999 mark, feel free to contact us and negotiate a different set of license terms.

ninh5• 14 years ago

edit We've changed it to "custom" pricing for now, and will work on an updated pricing table to better reflect our intention of having an SLA included. Thanks again!

Apologies for the "amateurish" impression, it was actually meant to be a plan that would include the entry level SLA with guaranteed response times. After reading some of the feedback here, it's definitely something we're aiming to fix in the next update. Thank you for your feedback! :)

backwardm• 14 years ago

In my humble opinion, the design work is incredible. Not at all busy—clean, professional looking and well made.

JonAtkinson• 14 years ago

The first line of this post mentions:

"Phusion Passenger is an Apache and Nginx module for deploying Ruby and Python web applications."

... yet I can't see any further mention of Python support in any of the linked roadmap posts, or on https://www.phusionpassenger.com/enterprise - does anyone have any more information about Python support?

tinco2• 14 years ago

We've supported Python for quite a long time, we made a bit more public here: http://blog.phusion.nl/2012/04/13/a-sneak-preview-of-phusion...

Basically you can just drop in a WSGI python app, and we will serve it up :)

FooBarWidget5• 14 years ago

Python support is in beta. We've actually already supported Python since 1.0, and it pretty much worked, but it remained an experiment and felt a little unpolished. Today, we've officially elevated it to "beta" status, meaning that it isn't terribly well documented yet, and may not feel as polished as Ruby support, but generally works well. We will publish blog articles and documentation about Python support in the near future. If you would like to stay up to date, please subscribe to our newsletter at http://eepurl.com/nXXrL

In a nutshell, you put your WSGI application code in passenger_wsgi.py. Point the virtual host's document root to the 'public' directory, and it just works. Very similar to Rack/Rails support, with passenger_wsgi.py substituting config.ru. See this for an example of Django on Phusion Passenger: https://github.com/kwe/passenger-django-wsgi-example/

sciurus• 14 years ago

When I looked at this around a year ago, there was surprisingly little code involved with supporting Python/WSGI. I was interested in adding support for Perl/PSGI; I decided that would take me longer than I had free time to commit, but for someone with more knowledge it might be a quick project and a real boon for running Perl web applications on shared hosting.

jolan• 14 years ago

Why doesn't my old license transfer? /sarcasm

http://www.modrails.com/enterprise.html

Should probably remove this page since they share the same name and all.

thibaut_barrere• 14 years ago

(I'm a first batch donor) in my understanding, we donated to support the development, but never bought a license (unless I'm mistaken?)

IbJacked• 14 years ago

Yep, it was a license purchase, sorta (I was in batch 2). From their website at the time: "you’ll be able to purchase the limited version of Phusion Passenger Enterprise Edition for the price that you think that it’s worth. Get it while supplies last." Followed by a big green button saying "BUY ENTERPRISE LICENSE TODAY".

BUT, right below that it said: Actually this is really a donation. The "enterprise" name is just a joke.

Wayback Machine Link: http://web.archive.org/web/20081210192914/http://www.modrail...

edit: removed some asterisks that were causing a display issue.

FooBarWidget5• 14 years ago

In the past we had a donation campaign where users can donate arbitrary amounts of money to us. We called it an "enterprise license" as a joke - the "enterprise license" just gave you a fancy logo with the word "enterprise" in it.

Phusion Passenger Enterprise is no longer a joke. It is now a real product with real features. A while ago we started "de-joking" the old donation page. As you can see at, the page now explicitly mentions that it's a donation. The 'enterprise.html' URL is kept to prevent links from breaking, but we may change that as well in the future to reduce confusion.

That said, we're grateful to all the people who have donated and supported us. Our Startup license type is our way to support other startups.

equalarrow• 14 years ago

Unfortunately, I cannot even get to the page - after a long wait, I get nothing. :( Guess I'll check back later today.

swalberg• 14 years ago

That deluxe version looks really out of place, almost as if it were thrown in there to make the pro version look good without thinking of the people that would be interested in something above pro.

When I put in my third server, do I have to buy the deluxe version (which takes my annual costs from $200 to $5000)? Or do I buy up to 25 of the pro licences to get up to 50 servers?

You may also want to consider making your commercial support offerings mesh with the enterprise licensing. As an example I seem to have to negotiate phone support and at best a 6 hour response time with the enterprise licencing or get an EUR 15K support contract to get 2 hours.

Ruphin4• 14 years ago

You can purchase as many Pro licenses as you wish, each license granting the use of Phusion Passenger Enterprise on 2 distinct servers. If your total license fee rises above $5000, feel free to contact us for a more tailored license.

The commercial support offering is available primarily for demanding enterprises who require high support levels for software to be incorporated into their stack. The level of support from these licenses is beyond what is expected for normal product support, including consultancy time with our deployment experts.

ninh5• 14 years ago

edit We've changed it to "custom" pricing for now, and will work on an updated pricing table to better reflect our intention of having an SLA included among other things. Thanks again! :)

Re: the deluxe version. Hmm, that wasn't our intention, we merely wanted to include a plan that had the entry level SLA pricing attached to it for support with guaranteed response-times. Apologies if it wasn't clear enough, but we'll be sure to fix this in a future site update.

Re: third server, if you're a startup, you'd end up buying 2 startup licenses. If you're not a startup, that'd be 2 pro licenses (or as you mentioned, buy 25 pro licenses to get up to 50 servers). Hope that clears things up a bit, it definitely is good to get constructive feedback like this so we can try and fix it. Much thanks! :)

wheaties• 14 years ago

As feedback I wish I could say to them this: "Everything looked great until I saw yourselves calling each other Ninjas. Chief Executive Ninja!? Bye."

At this point I might just be a bit jaded but the term ninja is about as flattering to me as peewee. It's not that I haven't worked with "ninjas" before and from that experience I've grown a very clear aversion to "ninja" anything. Add to that recruiters have picked up on the term and now everyone has to be a "ninja" to get the job. Really? Ugh.

Get rid of "ninja." Then I'll actually be able to point my boss to your website.

ninh5• 14 years ago

Re: 'Get rid of "ninja"' Done. Please consider pointing your boss to our website ;-) Thanks for the feedback, phusion.nl definitely needs a facelift and we're working on that, too :)

batista• 14 years ago

In the "Nedap story": "With activities branching into healthcare as well, it is important for their systems to be available at all times."

I think you can afford to lose the "as well".

davidw• 14 years ago

How is this going to interact with the open source version, going forward?

FooBarWidget5• 14 years ago

We will continue to develop the open source version. All changes in the open source version will end up in Enterprise, but Enterprise will have more features. We intend on making a living out of this so by buying Enterprise you will directly sponsor development of the open source version.

mlitwiniuk2• 14 years ago

Maybe you could create some kind of comparission table? Because it take some time now to understand what for I'm supposed to be paying for (and as long as passenger runs on few of my servers, it would be my pleasure to thank you for passenger by buying a license).

NoPiece• 14 years ago

You might consider bundling the enterprise version with union station. A startup version with a 2 server license and union station monitoring for both would be nice. You could also offer access to the union station beta for anyone who buys enterprise now.

Phusion Passenger Enterprise released

Related Stories