Hello world in every programming language

by QuarkSpark • 14 years ago

85 57 14 years ago

mtrn2• 14 years ago

While Hello World is nice, something a bit more involved could give you more insight. Among many people, Amit Singh (of MacFuse and Mac OS X Internals fame) did this with the Towers of Hanoi: http://www.kernelthread.com/projects/hanoi/ (111 Hanoi implementations total).

objclxt• 14 years ago

One of my favourites is 99 Bottles, with just under 1,500 implementations: http://99-bottles-of-beer.net/abc.html - some are inspiring, but others are just plain funny.

nrkn• 14 years ago

I manage a repo that has the bare bones of a roguelike in many languages.

It's a little more involved than a Hello World in that it needs to handle input, output, state etc.

I could always use more languages if anybody wants to pitch in.

https://github.com/nrkn/SimpleRL

doktrin• 14 years ago

Why is Morse code included? I'm not being flippant, but rather genuinely curious as to whether there's some basis for it being considered a "programming" language or precursor thereof.

This isn't to confuse Morse code with reMorse : http://esolangs.org/wiki/ReMorse

mtrn2• 14 years ago

I started to read Code: The Hidden Language of Computer Hardware and Software by Charles Petzold two days ago - and he starts with morse code (and braille). You're right, it's no programming language (just an encoding) - but seemingly near conceptually to a language (for Petzold, anyway - yay it's got 0's and 1's, too).

pmjordan• 14 years ago

Does the book really focus on Morse code having 0s and 1s? Isn't it technically a ternary encoding as opposed to a binary (0/1) one? The gaps between letters are pretty significant.

rikthevik• 14 years ago

Turing completeness is a pretty good indicator of whether you're looking at a programming language or not.

erode• 14 years ago

Missing F#.

printfn "Hello World"

evincarofautumn2• 14 years ago

Submit a pull request.

silvestrov• 14 years ago

Missing too an example written in RPG: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_RPG

I'm not going to submit a pull request, fortunately I've never had to write anything in that language.

Groxx• 14 years ago

Another very large set of hello worlds: http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Hello_world

luzon• 14 years ago

node.js is not a programming language.

aoprisan• 14 years ago

seriously, what's next? Hello World in all PHP frameworks?

furyofantares• 14 years ago

'Hello World' is not possible in javascript without support from whatever hosts it. The language itself has no support for input or output.

The site does have one filed only under 'javascript' implemented with alert(), but that's really javascript as it exists in browsers.

eurleif• 14 years ago

You could say the same about C. Sure, the C standard library is specified along with the language, but it's still a library, not a set of language features. You could have C without the stdlib. So does that mean an example in C with an alternative IO library would be ok, but not a similar example in Python?

I don't think whether IO is built into a language is really the important question. If people are interested in seeing how IO works with different frameworks, those examples should be there. But if people just want to see what a language's basic syntax looks like, not the specifics of emitting IO in various frameworks, there should be one example per language, even for languages which lack built-in IO.

tzaman• 14 years ago

Not very useful

rll3• 14 years ago

Technically Hello World in PHP is just:

Hello World

The one they have with <?php print("Hello World"); ?> is also an opcode longer than using <?php echo "Hello World"; ?> because off the FREE on the return value from the print. But a file just containing the string: Hello World and nothing else will generate the same opcodes as the echo version so they are equivalent and you might as well use the shorter form. A file without an opening <?php tag is still a perfectly valid PHP program.

lhnz• 14 years ago

Where do you learn such in depth information about PHP. The source code?

rll3• 14 years ago

It helps if you wrote a good chunk of it.

But one way that is easier than diving into the source code is to just dump the opcodes using vld (see pecl.vld). I have a little wrapper shell script /usr/local/bin/vld:

  #!/bin/sh -e
  exec php -dvld.active=1 -d vld.execute=0 "$@"

Then for the hello world program with the print() call:

  % vld hello1.php
  Finding entry points
  Branch analysis from position: 0
  Return found
  filename:       /tmp/hello1.php
  function name:  (null)
  number of ops:  3
  compiled vars:  none
  line     # *  op                           fetch            ext  return  operands
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     2     0  >   PRINT                                            ~0      'Hello+World'
           1      FREE                                                     ~0
     4     2    > RETURN                                                   1

  branch: #  0; line:     2-    4; sop:     0; eop:     2
  path #1: 0,

vs. the one that just contains the string: Hello World

  % vld hello2.php
  Finding entry points
  Branch analysis from position: 0
  Return found
  filename:       /tmp/hello2.php
  function name:  (null)
  number of ops:  2
  compiled vars:  none
  line     # *  op                           fetch          ext  return  operands
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     2     0  >   ECHO                                                     'Hello+World%0A'
           1    > RETURN                                                   1

  branch: #  0; line:     2-    2; sop:     0; eop:     1
  path #1: 0,

quink2• 14 years ago

MUMPS was left out. Like usual :P

w "Hello World",!

chris_wot2• 14 years ago

Everything I've ever heard about MUMPS says that it's awful. Is this true?

btwrto• 14 years ago

It's a language that predates C. Maybe some the things that you take for granted are not there, and some syntax is weird, and order of evaluation is strict left-to-right. (i.e. "'x+1=2+3" first computes 'not x', i.e. 0 or 1 if x=1 or x=0 respectively, then adds 1 to the result, then compares that result to 2, then adds 3 to that result, giving either 3 or 4 as a final answer).

but if you write controlled, sensible code, then it's actually not. certainly never my language of choice but it it's not just still used due to inertia... it's pretty fast, it makes database interaction easy, it's pretty easy to understand if the code isn't doing something awful like assuming variables and relying on hidden state. (which you can do, yes.)

if you're talking about the Daily WTF articles, then no it's not nearly as bad as those articles would imply. I worked for a company that is probably featured in one, but not all, of those articles... we had good tools, good coding standards/dev process, a good internal API/libraries that do quite a lot, and sensible people. Under these circumstances it was not bad--I'd actually grown quite fond of it. (No codebase of a large old company will be WTF-free but this isn't language-specific. I don't think any actual code from those Daily WTF articles actually comes from that company...)

Also, "A Case of the MUMPS" gets many things wrong.

'Scope of IF and FOR is "remainder of current line."' Nope. That's what 'do' is for. Note that ';' comments out everything to the right on the same line.

    for i=1:1:100 do  ; equivalent to 'for(int i=1;i<101; i++) { }', with the lines below indented with a period serving as the body of the brackets  
    . write !,"line 1 of code block, iteration "_i
    . write !,"line 2 of code block, iteration "_i
    . write !,"line 3 of code block, iteration "_i
    write !,"Done with loop" ; this gets executed after the for loop

Note that I'd actually write this as 'f i=1:1:100 d' and 'w "string"' in place of "for i=1:1:100 do" and 'write "string"'. It's just as easy to read if you know the language, especially if you have nice syntax highlighting, and easier to write. Which brings me to...

'To edit the code stored in the “database”, developers needed to use the internally-created text editor.'

Not in our case, and this makes me wonder how long ago this guy's experience was. in our case, the vendor provided an IDE and we also had our own, written in C#, which is actually my favorite IDE from any language.

asjo• 14 years ago

COMAL 80 is missing. Too bad I don't remember anything of it :-)

trin_• 14 years ago

im not sure but that should just be:

10 PRINT "Hello World"

baddox• 14 years ago

The Rosetta Code is a much more interesting and useful site along the same lines.

http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Rosetta_Code

gtani• 14 years ago

There's probably a lot more cheats and cookbooks, but:

http://pleac.sourceforge.net/

http://hyperpolyglot.org/

drucken• 14 years ago

Largest collection "Hello world" in programming languages (441 at last count): http://www.roesler-ac.de/wolfram/hello.htm

It even has BCPL and LabVIEW!

simonbarker87• 14 years ago

LabVIEW is missing - can git support it?

Update:

And I don't see Processing either

BasDirks• 14 years ago

I am not quite sure why the Haskell program needs a module statement.

tome• 14 years ago

The Python 3 version works in Python 2 as well. They may as well unify them.

scriptproof• 14 years ago

One page list, more languages: http://www.scriptol.com/programming/hello-world.php (and older)

reitzensteinm2• 14 years ago

I remember reading that the Malbolge author was 'working' on a Hello World program, and thought that was awesome. Now I see why:

https://github.com/leachim6/hello-world/blob/master/m/malbol...

I wonder if it was written by hand; that would be impressive. Doesn't look like it would be too hard to hand roll a little compiler for it.

shalmanese• 14 years ago

It was created using a genetic algorithm IIRC.

tomjen3• 14 years ago

At least the first one wasn't made by hand. It was created by a stochastic beam search program written it Common Lisp.

And if I recall correctly, it took years to do.

reitzensteinm2• 14 years ago

OK, rereading the specs, I completely take back what I said about handrolling a compiler not being difficult. Damn.

chris_wot2• 14 years ago

I think my head just exploded.

ushi• 14 years ago

This repo is out of date. There are 9 months old pull requests open. Here is a fork: https://github.com/c00kiemon5ter/hello-world

knowtheory• 14 years ago

of course, it doesn't explain how to build and/or run any of them :P

zackzackzack• 14 years ago

I note a suspicious lack of DCPU-16.

jfoutz2• 14 years ago

Has I/O been pinned down?

jabr• 14 years ago

There's an implementation in the pull request queue.

jiganet• 14 years ago

Hello world in PostScript:

/Times-Roman findfont 12 scalefont newpath 200 200 moveto (Hello World) show closepath Showpage

Use this in gs on Linux or y gswin32 on windows

franze2• 14 years ago

well, certainly not every programming language.

i.e.: i'm one of the most senior ACT3 programmers worldwide. (well, there were only about a dozen or so people) it was a programming language used extensively at the national austria press agency. it was - at it's time (around 2001) - for more advanced as PHP 4. the hello world would have looked something like this

(the  was a relict from ACT2 ...)

yes it was an abomination, but it worked, and it was fast.

ok, anyway, ARC is missing, too. I think the claim "every programming language" is a) wrong and b) not really feasible.

bmelton• 14 years ago

It's a work in progress, with the goal of getting every programming language in there.

Submit a pull request for ACT3 and you'll have one less language's absence to notice.

franze2• 14 years ago

will do. still "every programming language" - it's not really feasible.

does anyone know how many company/cooperation internal programming language are supposed to exist? is there even a way to estimate it?

albertzeyer• 14 years ago

"every programming language" is an infinite set. Every programming language where an interpreter/compiler was implemented once is maybe better. But, when you consider that most programmers have at one point invented their own language, or languages (I cannot really count how much toy languages I have created at some point), it is still way too much and impossible to get them all. Maybe more restrictive would be to take languages which at least 2 people have used at one point. But even then...

The point I'm trying to make is: "Every programming language" will always be wrong.

joshbaptiste• 14 years ago

I prefer the FizzBuzz examples as it also displays the simple looping constructs of the languages http://rosettacode.org/wiki/FizzBuzz

Edit: Grr it is missing one of my favorite JVM.next() languages of the week Kotlin, I will have to update it.

jfoutz2• 14 years ago

No love for intercal? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INTERCAL Hmm. piet is missing too. http://www.retas.de/thomas/computer/programs/useless/piet/in...

goggles99• 14 years ago

Where is the PL/I?

Hello world in every programming language

Related Stories