Why not render posts at publication time rather than request time?

http://static.matthewlmcclure.com/s/2012/04/22/wasteful-computation.html

by matthewlmcclure • 14 years ago

8 7 14 years ago

static.matthewlmcclure.com

Maxious• 14 years ago

So we're back to Movable Type circa 2002? ;)

Nikkau• 14 years ago

Publication time or request time doesn't matters, Varnish is in front.

jroes• 14 years ago

Yeah, we've discussed this before. http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2945463

I think the ubiquity and ease of use of things like WordPress causes people to overlook this solution. Also, I believe the caching plugins that people use with WordPress are doing something very similar.

There are a lot of static site/blog generators out there like Jekyll, but not many of them are targeted toward a general audience. WordPress is easy and well-known.

tibbon• 14 years ago

Mainly because currently people's time > computation time.

Is it even worth my time to setup caching on a blog that gets 10 hits a day? Probably not.

ceejayoz• 14 years ago

Every major blogging framework has caching either built in or as a plugin.

lmm• 14 years ago

Because premature optimization is the root of all evil

read_wharf• 14 years ago

Wasteful organization.

The post:

  http://static.matthewlmcclure.com/s/2012/04/22/wasteful-computation.html

One up, 404:

  http://static.matthewlmcclure.com/s/2012/04/22/

One up, 404:

  http://static.matthewlmcclure.com/s/2012/04/

One up, 404:

  http://static.matthewlmcclure.com/s/2012/

One up, something:

  http://static.matthewlmcclure.com/s/

Why do this? I understand the desire to organize, but why make bins with nothing in them? As it is, all he needs is /s/.

I would naturally expect .../2012/ to have either all the 2012 posts or all months that have posts, .../2012/04/ to have all of 2012's April posts or all days that have posts, etc. But not nothing.

Why not render posts at publication time rather than request time?

Related Stories