Best TLD that can't be taken down by US/etc?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3468595

by Andrenid • 15 years ago

71 38 15 years ago

news.ycombinator.com

This is purely hypothetical (I'm way too vanilla to actually have a use for this), but me and a friend were wondering... considering the US now lays claim to any .com domain as their own jurisdiction, and also considering how many domains are getting taken down lately for "arguable" offences, which TLD would you use to have a site that is "safe"?

Just say you wanted a blog where you could post anything you wanted, and host anything you wanted.

Assuming you don't care about the branding benefits of a major TLD.

foxylad• 15 years ago

For this audience? Gotta be *.geek.nz.

nextparadigms• 15 years ago

Maybe the one from Iceland. You'll need a country that doesn't bow easily to US, but also doesn't have its own laws for easily taking down domains either. You might find blockaid.me useful, too.

1782• 15 years ago

ISNIC, in charge with *.is, sez: "Under what circumstances would ISNIC close or delete the domain wikileaks.is based on the contents of their website?

The answer is simple, such an action would require a formal court order from an Icelandic court. ISNIC has never been handed such a verdict about any .is-domain during its close to 25 years of history."

http://www.isnic.is/en/news/view?id=204

c1sc02• 15 years ago

One of the reasons why I chose a .is domain for my personal blog. A few gotchas though: registering a .is domain takes a while (think days/weeks instead of minutes) and your TTL needs to be high. http://fr.anc.is

ComputerGuru• 15 years ago

Welcome to Hacker News. Thanks for sharing and contributing, it's appreciated.

Please refrain from using '1337' speak here. s/sez/says/ and thank you.

Benares• 15 years ago

First, find a TLD that isn't administered by a company doing business in the U.S. on http://iana.org/

If relevant to your domain's future content, optionally consult http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_parties_to_internationa... and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_parties_to_internationa...

Then register your domain(s) with an ethical registrar that does not do business in the U.S. and will only respond to court orders in their own country.

A possible option would be http://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/st.html through http://www.nic.st/ . The company (Bahnhof) has a vocal history of protecting it's clients against corporate depredations; see http://www.thelocal.se/18882/20090416/

ashconnor2• 15 years ago

The trend in piracy sites is to register .ru/.me of their chosen domain name.

joelrunyon• 15 years ago

Who controls .me?

ashconnor2• 15 years ago

A company called doMEn (domain.me) based in Montenegro.

joejohnson• 15 years ago

.onion

https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-hidden-service.html.en

justindocanto2• 15 years ago

.onion is not a TLD. I've seen it classified as a "psuedo TLD" but either way.... dot onion would be a horrible substitute to anything mentioned in the comments. the user base for tor/oninion is catastrophically smaller and the requirements to view a .onion site reaches a little further than the general public can take. think of how many people don't even realize there's VERSIONS of internet explorer and have never upgraded. cringes

thebigshane3• 15 years ago

[http://dot-bit.org/Main_Page]

   What is Namecoin

   Namecoin is a peer-to-peer generic name/value datastore 
   system based on Bitcoin technology (a decentralized 
   cryptocurrency). It allows you to :

   Securely register names (domains for example), no 
   possible censorship!
   Trade and transact namecoins, the digital currency NMC. 

   Read more about Namecoin.


   What is Dot-BIT

   Dot-BIT, the first project using namecoin, is building a 
   domain name system (DNS) using the .bit TLD. Our goal is 
   to spread .bit domains by providing resources and tools 
   to the community, from developers to end users.

[Edit: Perhaps this is being downvoted for not providing any extra information myself. If you truly want a resource that can't be taken down, then it will require some technical effort on your part AND your audience: either .onion hidden services or .bit names, OR just a static IP address.]

thebigshane3• 15 years ago

On another note, if the motivation is due to SOPA, then SOPA targets all foreign domains (not able to take your server down, but prevent other American's from resolving your domain name -- and I should also not that this was before today, where they seem to have taken that part out of the bill).

lancewiggs• 15 years ago

.nz justly prides itself on a robust, cheap and fair disputes resolution service. It's based in New Zealand, a country which is regularly ranked in the top three least corrupt in the world, and currently number 1.

InternetNZ is an open membership charitable society that is the delegated country manager for .nz and has the objective to strive for an open and uncapturable internet.

They delegated the day to day management of .nz to www.dnc.org.nz, who also run the disputes service (http://dnc.org.nz/story/drs-home), while the register itself is delegated by InternetNZ to www.nzrs.net.nz. This structure was set up to ensure that these sorts of issues would be resolved appropriately.

I note that the new gTLDs (.whatever) will need to use ICANN's standard dispute resolution process, which is convoluted, lengthy and expensive. I do not know how these will fare under SOPA et al.

(I'm an elected Councillor of InternetNZ. http://internetnz.net.nz)

mhansen• 15 years ago

FYI to people considering .nz: WHOIS Privacy is not allowed in .nz.

I'm very happy with my .nz domain, but it's lame that I have to have my home address in a publicly accessible database.

taf2• 15 years ago

use a PO box? unless there are some downsides, like ssl cert issuers not issuing for PO box?

this looks easy enough: https://poboxes.usps.com/poboxonline/search/landingPage.do

I'd assume other countries provide something similar?

MatthewPhillips• 15 years ago

Don't use domain privacy. By using it you give up legal ownership of your domain. The entity listed in WHOIS legally owns the domain.

Nick_C• 15 years ago

I'd be wary of putting NZ ahead of others. NZ is currently negotiating a Free Trade Agreement with the U.S. If it is anything like Australia's, and it will be simply because the U.S. has more clout, NZ will have to agree to implement, among other things, the same copyright laws as in the U.S.

Australia had to implement the ridiculous "70 year after death" rule, and so on.

dsl• 15 years ago

Outside the reach of the US pretty much means countries with hostile diplomatic relations. Any safety you might be afforded by other countries (say New Zealand or Sweden) depends on if you are worth someone in DC picking up a telephone. A quick check over at the State Department website gives us a few candidates:

  Belarus - Nope. Most of the DNS infrastructure is hosted in US friendly countries (Poland, Russia, etc.)
  Burma (Myanmar) - Nope. Getting a domain requires being friendly with the government.
  Cuba - Nope. Requires physical presence in Cuba.
  Democratic Republic of the Congo - Nope. Registration open to anyone, but DNS servers are in the US(!), Sweden, Republic of South Africa.
  Iran - Maybe. Generally open for registration, and one of the more tech savvy sanctioned countries. Don't mention politics, religion, porn, or any other sensitive topics and you should be ok.
  Libya - Nope. Democracy is on it way, please allow 6-8 weeks for shipping.
  North Korea - Nope. Must have presence in country for registration. All infrastructure and management actually takes place in Thailand.
  Syria - Maybe. Hosted and managed in country, but a shitstorm is on the horizon.

soult• 15 years ago

You just listed the countries where your domain is most likely to be seized by the government. Well, maybe add UAE and Saudi Arabia for completeness' sake.

I don't think a call from Washington DC to any country is enough to shut down domains, otherwise, what would the US need SOPA for?

doobie• 15 years ago

He actually listed countries that are highly unlikely to cave to pressure from the US. This list, by design, is comprised of what you might call less than friendly hosts.

justindocanto2• 15 years ago

i dont have any technical evidence to back this up but i feel like .ru domains tend to be pretty resilient to US take downs. i've seen so many blatantly illegal websites and/or hacking scripts hosted on .ru domains that seem to never go away. granted, i'm sure they also trigger spam filters like crazy.

.nz i could see catching on. there's got to be a much more 'friendly' TLD though. nz doesn't feel as generic as com/biz/net/org

who controls .mobi?

keane• 15 years ago

Maybe Switzerland's .ch/.li - info at https://www.nic.ch/reg/index/view.html?lid=en

You might note that .ch/.li is used by a number of controversial sites at the moment such as:

  1channel (.ch)
  Anonops IRC (.li, also .lc)
  Encyclopædia Dramatica (.ch) (IRC used by LulzSec, IRCop arrested)
  Wikileaks (.ch, used when EveryDNS disabled .org)
  Putlocker (.ch, mirror of .com)
  Quicksilverscreen (.ch)

See this article about pressure from the US and French governments on .ch (Switch) to censor WL, which they refused: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/04/wikileaks-site-s...

WIPO has assembled links to various ccTLD's policies; here is their page for .ch http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/cctld/ch/index.html

pestaa• 15 years ago

I know a medium-sized site in Hungary, Europe that is in the process of moving to an .org TLD. They said SOPA couldn't touch that extension, but I'm not sure. They host content that can be easily argued as copyrighted (by someone else, of course.)

Best TLD that can't be taken down by US/etc?

Related Stories