Bitwarden Extension disabled due to new permissions

https://github.com/bitwarden/browser/issues/1548

by Belphemur • 5 years ago

42 12 5 years ago

arvidkahl• 5 years ago

This behavior caused us to get blanket permissions for an extension I worked on in the past. We’d add a new permitted URL to support a newly integrated site, only to have the extension disable itself for all our customers, most of which wouldn’t even use that new integration.

While I understand the reasoning behind such an automated disabling, but it probably could be done better. Like delaying the update (and the disabling part) until the user made a choice.

Also very hard to inform users of this issue after it has occurred. Caused us so much trouble. Also a reason we went with the admittedly less safe blanket permission.

tehlike• 5 years ago

Or dynamic permissions like in android.

NikolaeVarius• 5 years ago

When this update popped up, I seriously thought something was wrong since the new permission didn't make any sense. Disabled update across everywhere I use extension.

jve• 5 years ago

Noticed this yesterday and opened chrome web store to perhaps read what new functionality new permissions do bring, but found NO information. Disappointed.

Ofcourse reading this github issue I only now found that they introduced Biometrics. https://bitwarden.com/help/article/biometrics/#browser-exten...

JaggedJax• 5 years ago

This update makes it clear the importance of displaying the changelog along with the new permissions request. With FireFox I had to manually go to the extension page and find/read the release notes to understand the new permission.

fabbari2• 5 years ago

  This was annoying to me - a nerd - and a bad teaching moment for my parents - computer illiterates - that just learned to click "OK" to add new permissions, so that they could use the password manager again, without really knowing "why".

  This was the perfect storm of s**t choices by all involved. 

  The browsers - rather than disabling the extension, should have just kept the old permissions and fail/ask for new permissions for the .5% of people that will be using the native application to enable biometric unlocking.

  Bitwarden - knowing that Firefox didn't allow this permission to be optional - should have held back until Firefox did implement it, or simply should have disabled the feature on Firefox.

toyg• 5 years ago

What are you on about? This behaviour is for Chrome. The Firefox extension looks fine.

trickjarrett• 5 years ago

I had to approve the update of the plugin due to the new extension for Firefox

fabbari2• 5 years ago

  RTFA: Bitwarden developers wanted to make the permission optional, but for Firefox access to native applications can't be requested as an optional requirement. Result: they added the new permission as non optional on both and broke both.

  If the extension was working without that permission before - as it was - the browsers should have kept running without the permission and asked for it only when needed, IE: in the cases where the native application was running and the user decided to unlock the vault by using biometrics. 

  That's a fail for both Chrome and Firefox, both of which will disable the extension until the new permission is given.

  Bitwarden failed by not considering the wider impact of their choice to change the required permissions knowing that they could have had the feature in Chrome - by using the permission as optional - and not in Firefox, thus not breaking people's usage of it.

Shorel• 5 years ago

I use both. The extension was disabled in both browsers.

da_n• 5 years ago

The amount of entitlement ringing through the comments on the issue is crazy. It really makes me frustrated to see as it just adds fire to putting companies off the idea of developing open source software.

Bitwarden Extension disabled due to new permissions

Related Stories