The Ordeal of Immigrating Legally

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/04/the-ordeal-of-immigrating-legally/237166/

by cwan • 15 years ago

16 26 15 years ago

I think people in the tech industry "get it" when it comes to immigration, but that flies in the face of so much of the xenophobia I see out there. Maybe the tech industry should invest in some educational outreach efforts to at least try and change the tide of things? I see too many talented people come to America only to pack and go home a few years later.

hugh32• 15 years ago

I've never really seen any sort of xenophobia in the US. It's one of the least xenophobic places in the world.

The real barriers to foreigners coming to the US are all bureaucratic.

alextp• 15 years ago

How is your experience in the US? Is it mostly NYC, New England, and California (or big cities in other places)? From what I hear rural america (which controls a disproportionate share of the voting power) tends to be more xenophobic, specially around the border with mexico.

davidmurphy• 15 years ago

I don't know. I have encountered people who frankly I find to be quite racist/ethnically biased against Hispanics, for instance.

ojbyrne• 15 years ago

Recently in an AR hotel the tv was broadcasting the story of Yuri Milner buying a house in CA for $100 million, and mentioned it had a pool. One of the people in the room said, quite loudly, "they should have drowned him in the pool before they showed it." I'm pretty sure that was related to him being a foreigner.

bigwally• 15 years ago

I've seen plenty of xenophobia coming from the US media. How you've managed to never see any is a miracle.

pan69• 15 years ago

"I've never really seen any sort of xenophobia in the US. It's one of the least xenophobic places in the world."

Sorry. But that really made me laugh out loud. Seriously. Where do you think that bureaucracy finds it's origin?

grandalf7• 15 years ago

I don't see how anyone can justify barriers preventing people from immigrating to the US. A 100% open policy would be the best humanitarian approach and would also lead to the most economic growth.

lionheart• 15 years ago

While I completely agree that in theory a 100% open policy would be ideal, practically there is no way the US could accommodate the sudden influx of immigrants that would result if we were to completely open our borders.

100% open immigration from Western Europe, Canada, Australia, and similar countries... could possibly work.

100% open immigration to anybody who speaks fluent English... could possibly work.

But opening up our borders completely to Eastern Europe, Asia, South America, Africa would create complete chaos.

As an immigrant to the US from the former Soviet Union I know how hard it is to really learn the language, the culture, and assimilate to the point where you're actually leading a decent life and being a productive member of society.

It took my family about 4 years to really get situated and both of my parents are highly educated with a very strong work ethic and we had previous family living here.

And we had to be supported by welfare and other government programs for 3 of those years.

Although obviously a net gain over time, it takes a lot of resources to bring an immigrant into the American fold and we don't have enough of those resources to open our doors to everybody right now.

And it wouldn't even be good for the immigrants. With a large influx of people from their country coming in, most would probably just settle somewhere together, assimilate much slower and possibly even turn to semi-criminal activity like many Russian immigrants I knew in New York.

No, we need to change our immigration policy, but not just by opening up the doors.

grandalf7• 15 years ago

Well, then at least we should increase the number of immigrants by upwards of 10% per year until a point where nobody is turned away.

The more immigrants we get, the more channels will exist for assimilation. Many colleges and universities are having a tough time staying in business, and major cities like Detroit are falling into decay b/c nobody wants to live there.

When you consider how hard people have to work elsewhere even to get by, pretty much anyone with enough gumption to come to the US would eventually attain a middle class lifestyle, then many would exceed it.

And even if some remained very poor, it's probably better to be very poor in the US than in many developing nations.

araes• 15 years ago

This is largely hyperbole and anecdotal evidence.

Where you say you were from a highly educated family with a strong work ethic, and took several years to be stable, I can point to reams of illegally immigrating Mexicans who are uneducated, the definition of dirt poor, by definition take limited gov't funding, and yet still make ends meet.

Yes, heavy immigration would be tough on some, and would require expansion of immigration services, but would be far from chaos. If there was still a requirement for a verified job, or some other method of supporting yourself, it would be a net boon. In addition, many of these immigrants would bring funds which would be spent while they established themselves.

America needs people. We're enormous, have a surplus of many natural resources (including food) and we're turning people away who are perfectly qualified. We're also far too insular for our own good, and need the exposure of mixing cultures to keep the melting pot working.

Those people may establish enclaves, but over time they integrate and enrich us simply due to edge interactions. Chinese, Irish, Russians - they've all formed enclaves at some point in America, and yet have still contributed to our society.

hugh32• 15 years ago

Sure, if you don't mind living in a United States with a population of one billion, composed largely of poverty-stricken shanty towns.

It's just plain osmosis. Open the borders, and people flow into the US until it reaches the point where living in the US is no longer any better than living... in whatever the current worst country in the world is.

uvdiv2• 15 years ago

How does having poor people living and working in the same country as you make you poorer? Your ideology looks to me like socialism except in reverse: you want to restrict free capitalism in order to keep the poor segregated and in poverty.

grandalf7• 15 years ago

Phasing it in at 10% increase in total immigrants per year would be fine as well.

Many of the people living in shanty towns are victims of failed institutions, corrupt leaders, and oppression. With this removed their resulting standard of living would likely be at least middle class. The lazy and unmotivated from those nations would stay there, and the motivated would arrive on US shores ready to improve things for themselves.

patrickgzill3• 15 years ago

Mexico, Central America, and large parts of South America would be empty in a matter of weeks.

grandalf7• 15 years ago

If someone is motivated enough to drop everything and take a big risk immigrating to the US to start a new life, I welcome them.

bbb• 15 years ago

Case in point: the American tax payer has payed for about 4.5 years of my graduate CS education, which, according to my visa documents, exceeds $200,000 in total cost. I'd like to stay, (re-)pay taxes, and I already had a six-digit job offer from a well-known American company. Further, my home country's embassy submitted, in writing, that they have no objection to me staying in the US, even permanently. Nonetheless, I'm getting "kicked out" this summer within 30 days after I graduate.

I trust there must be good reasons on a global scale... but in my local view this makes only limited sense.

(Btw., this is the J-1 visa home residency rule, for those who care. I need to live in my home country for at least two years before I can apply for an H-1b. Two years at home is just long enough to settle in and make moving _again_ not very attractive.)

splat• 15 years ago

A classic flowchart on the hassle of legal immigration:

http://reason.org/files/cb299f0134ca8bb75243c69caa92eea7.pdf

The Ordeal of Immigrating Legally

Related Stories