Amazon Kindle is a Hit

http://ryanspoon.com/blog/2008/07/10/amazon-kindle-is-a-hit-12-of-book-sales-on-amazon-doubled-since-may/

by kimboslice • 18 years ago

26 41 18 years ago

dkasper• 18 years ago

I was just talking about the kindle with one of my housemates. I don't have one, but my boss does, and apparently loves it. E-Ink is definitely a cool technology. I've heard some people say there are some things that should be changed in "Kindle 2.0". Any word on if/when the next version's coming out?

mynameishere• 18 years ago

It costs 359 dollars, which is insane for something which has capabilities somewhat short of the 386 laptop I bought many years ago for 40 dollars. Yet...print is dead. I've come to this conclusion as a long-time book-reader and semi-ludite. There's just no reason to haul around wood pulp at a storage efficiency 1/1,000,000,000th of the state of the art.

So, I guess things are bound to change. But 359 dollars? Cripe.

mechanical_fish• 18 years ago

It sounds expensive until you try to estimate the cost of my book collection. Double cripe.

The number of O'Reilly books that can be bought for $359 is depressingly small. If and when O'Reilly fully supports Kindle (and vice versa) Kindles will really start flying off the shelves:

http://toc.oreilly.com/2008/06/select-oreilly-books-soon-on-...

UPDATE: Of course, some of the book pricing is going to need a reality adjustment. $10 more than a used paper copy is too much. And the catalog could use some proofreading too: did you know that Don Roberts wrote "Refactoring"?

http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-...

Tichy8• 18 years ago

Also, the ebooks are just as expensive as the paper books, which just doesn't seem fair. Especially since I can sell my paper books, but not the ebooks (I presume).

cmos• 18 years ago

Let's not underestimate the cost of always being online + ready to download/buy. Amazon made a huge step in selling a consumer electronics device that is always 'on'-line.

There really isn't anything comparable.

And what is so impressive is that they realized that the 'reader' needs content on demand to be a viable product beyond us geeks. (ok, Us non-wealthy geeks, of which I am a member, would like to join you in the campfire song: I like to read digit-a-lly, but the kindle sells so expensiv-e-ly)

(it has a country twang to it)

rms5• 18 years ago

If I could buy the black and white screen used on the OLPC XO in bulk I could make a better ebook reader (for geeks, wi-fi and USB will have to do for connectivity, CDMA is way too much money and hassle though it is what gives the kindle such broad appeal) and sell it for $199.

When is that screen technology going to move beyond the XO?

Tichy8• 18 years ago

Go for it!? I am desperately waiting for a good e-book reader.

rms5• 18 years ago

I don't think it's for sale, but I emailed and asked.

http://www.pixelqi.com/products

blurry• 18 years ago

The screen on Kindle is nothing like a computer screen, XO or otherwise. To make images, it arranges colored particles using an applied electric field. To illustrate just one implication, it does not have any backlighting whatsoever, which means (1) there is no eye strain and you can read in direct sunlight, (2) it never becomes hot so you can read for hours, and (3) it holds images indefinitely without drawing electricity so battery life is very long.

rms5• 18 years ago

The black and white XO screen doesn't have a backlight. When you turn the backlight on the screen becomes lower resolution and color. Not to get into a spitting match about which screen is more unique, but the XO screen is pretty damn unique.

kimboslice• 18 years ago

I love the thing. I've played with it hands on and it's a remarkable gadget... BUT I have two complaints:

1) I'd love a backlight that can be switched on to conserve battery

2) I would pay for ability to surf the net / access blogs without the Kindle-subscription service

dmv• 18 years ago

Re #1, I presume you mean "switched off" to conserve battery. The thing is, a backlight wouldn't really work with the eInk screen. eInk is an ink technology designed to mimic ink on paper. Like paper, you read the screen by light bouncing off it, not through it. Think of reading a backlit sheet of paper, like a transparency on a projector -- more pleasant to read the reflection than have it lit from behind.

I have a Motorola MOTOFONE F3, which also uses an eInk display. It has a light source -- an LED between the display and outer plastic. Works ok, but direct reflected light (like a flashlight) works better in low light conditions.

I think you can just use a normal booklight with the Kindle.

LogicHoleFlaw2• 18 years ago

Booklights are so awkward. Some sort of integrated lighting solution so I can read while curled up under the covers would be great.

Tichy8• 18 years ago

How is the competition? iRex? There must have been some new devices coming out since the kindle launched?

Is the Amazon ebooks shop compatible with other ebook readers, or do they do the iTunes thing?

marijn• 18 years ago

The Sony prs-505 is very similar but without the full keyboard and ability to get books without a pc. I got one earlier this year and I like it.

Tichy8• 18 years ago

Does it have a touch screen? I think the first Sony Readers didn't have one.

raghus2• 18 years ago

“On a title-by-title basis, of the 130,000 titles available on Kindle and in physical form, Kindle sales now make up over 12% of sales for those titles…".

So, it is 12% of those 130K titles, not 12% of all book sales on AMZN. I am not sure how many titles Amazon sells overall but it's probably much greater than 130K which means that the Kindle's share is lower.

Just wanted to point out that the post's title might not be entirely accurate.

(Update: it looks like Amazon stocks several million book titles)

mhartl• 18 years ago

Exactly. I saw the title and said, "I don't believe that for a second." It just didn't pass the smell test.

aneesh• 18 years ago

Agreed, the title is misleading. But you're also misleading by saying that these are merely some 130K out of millions of titles.

Those are 130K of the highest-selling books by volume on Amazon - I wouldn't be surprised if they accounted for 30-50% of sales, even though they're a much smaller fraction of the millions of titles

So it's not 12% of Amazon sales, but still a significant fraction of that.

immad• 18 years ago

Are they definitely the highest-selling books or just the ones that Amazon could get licensed to in electronic form?

raghus2• 18 years ago

...but you're also misleading... - no, I am not.

In fact I took care to say that Amazon stocks several million titles - they might not sell a copy of every one of those every month.

staunch• 18 years ago

Lies, damned lies, and statistics. It's 12% of "sales" not 12% of revenue (or even profit). Does Bezos have so much invested in making people believe Kindle is a success that he's willing to basically lie?

wildwood• 18 years ago

I assumed when I read it that "sales" meant units. Seems like a perfectly reasonable way to track this, and not a "lie" at all.

Tamerlin• 18 years ago

Bezos isn't lying. Though it's true that the article's author is exaggerating things a bit, the reality is that Kindle's doing fairly well. I personally believe that the primary roadblocks it's facing are the lack of color (which I believe is due to cost issues with the technology, since the e-paper stuff is pretty new), and the price tag.

However, it also hasn't been on the market for very long, so I'd say that although it hasn't so far been a "killer" product, it HAS been generating enough revenue that it will probably justify a v2. (That's what I'm hoping for, because I'll probably be in line for a v2 model... though if the price tag came down to $200, I might get one now.)

simianstyle• 18 years ago

Am I the only person who thinks that the subjective "WOW" is unnecessary from the post title?

nickb2• 18 years ago

Amazons is still hiding the number of Kindles sold. Why do you think that is? Kindles are probably not selling well at all.

LogicHoleFlaw2• 18 years ago

DRM makes it a no-go for me. I'd love to use an eBook reader but the current lock-in strategy from the major vendors is a huge turn-off.

steveplace• 18 years ago

They may be holding that information until the next earnings report. I'm pretty sure they'll be pressed to disclose it then.

joeter• 18 years ago

I've been wondering if enterprises are going to start using kindles for positions that deal with a lot of traveling paperwork.

TweedHeads• 18 years ago

I rather have the convenience of an iPhone and download books at 99cts from the App Store.

Some will say "the eyes blah blah the ink blah blah" but I tell you, I surf ten hours a day in my old monitor and have had no eye problems for the past 20 years.

Create• 18 years ago

right to read.

http://diveintomark.org/archives/2007/11/19/the-future-of-re...

http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html

Amazon Kindle is a Hit

Related Stories