Nuts & Bolts: New Datacenter

http://37signals.com/svn/posts/2471-nuts-bolts-new-datacenter

by jbyers • 16 years ago

19 11 16 years ago

staunch3• 16 years ago

Yikes. I see Isilon and I think someone just spent 500k where they could have spent 75k and used MogileFS or similar. I suppose 37 signal's profit margins are good enough that it doesn't matter, but I'm glad it's not my money.

Moving to their own servers makes sense though. No doubt that's going to save them over paying a huge premiuim for Rackspace. With three full-time people it's a good move.

tptacek• 16 years ago

If you had tens of thousands of customers, would you bet your company on a homebrew MogileFS setup? And are you sure you'd save enough money to justify a port?

staunch3• 16 years ago

Yes. I'm confident in my abilities to overcome absolutely any problem that might occur. For the same reasons I choose Linux and open source solutions over Windows or other proprietary solutions: there's always a way out. Isilon, Cisco, or Oracle only provide the illusion of certainty.

jcapote• 16 years ago

They were using MogileFS, perhaps they outgrew it: http://groups.google.com/group/mogile/browse_thread/thread/a...

Do some research before you shit on some technical decision.

lsc• 16 years ago

my experience (and my experience in this is a few years old, so take that for what it is) has been that commercial SAN/NAS products have a significant reliability or performance edge over their open-source competitors. Note, I said reliability /or/ performance; the key bit you get from netapp or emc that I can't do with a linux box is cache coherency across multiple heads.

If you fire the money cannon at NetApp, they'll give you two heads, each with write-back cache in it. when you make a write, it will write to each head before returning, so either head can crash or lose power at any time without interrupting anything, and you get the speed of write-back cache, which is pretty great.

Now, the problem is that NetApp and friends charge a /ridiculous/ premium for this. I'm not saying it's a good deal. I'm just saying that /right now/ as far as I can tell, there are things you get from paying netapp and the like that you can't get from freenas.

Personally, I'm cheap, so I use local storage, and end up paying a whole lot less for disk. But if I was successful at selling a product that was not tied to my costs? then maybe my decision would be different.

imbriaco• 16 years ago

For the record, we used to run MogileFS. The Isilon gear is a radical improvement and the price premium isn't anywhere near as bad as the numbers you presented. It was more expensive, but safety of our customer data is our most important job and we're more confident in the Isilon gear than we ever were with MogileFS.

there• 16 years ago

tldr: they moved from rackspace to their own colocated servers at someone else's datacenter, they didn't build a new datacenter. not sure why anyone would really care about this...

wsongk• 16 years ago

It do interested me tought, especially how they designed their hardware architecture to match their need. Their apps is quite different from other web startup, I think each user got his/her own DB instance. We all heard stories how facebook or twitter which data is stored in one huge DB scale. I'd like to know how 37signals did it and looking forward to their next article.

Nuts & Bolts: New Datacenter

Related Stories