Study finds almost half of all cancers linked to preventable factors

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/study-finds-almost-half-of-all-cancers-linked-to-preventable-factors-1.3434002

by cpncrunch • 10 years ago

77 54 10 years ago

blakesterz• 10 years ago

I wonder how many places will report this with the headline: "Study finds majority of all cancers are not preventable"

I can't tell exactly what this does mean... does it really mean most cancers are just not preventable? If 45% are preventable, then are the rest NOT? The risks [0] are pretty obvious. The "Other Risks" [1] are rather interesting though.

[0] http://albertapreventscancer.ca/reduce-your-risk/

[1]http://albertapreventscancer.ca/reduce-your-risk/other-risks...

skylan_q• 10 years ago

How about the notion that we've figured out all the causal links/factors for the different kinds of cancer?

chrisamiller2• 10 years ago

Many cancers really aren't avoidable, as there's a spectrum of causes. The mutations that cause cancer can come from many sources - carcinogen exposure, UV light/radiation, inherited defects, or unavoidable errors that occur when cells divide (on average, around 3 errors per cell division).

Getting cancer is a lot like playing the lottery (or perhaps more accurately, Russian Roulette). It requires an accumulation of mutations in two or more key genes, and these mutations occur more or less randomly throughout the genome, regardless of cause. So maybe your first hit happens from a chest X-ray, and the second hit comes from smoking. Or maybe you just get old and the replication errors pile up in blood stem cells, giving you leukemia.

The point is that it's all probablistic, and that's why some smokers live to be 100 cancer-free, and some health-nut marathoners get cancer. In general, though, these external factors can bend the odds one way or the other.

saiya-jin3• 10 years ago

very well said, this can be copied to all those articles about food causing/not causing cancers that seem to pop up recently. not much more is needed to know on this topic

erkkie4• 10 years ago

While still (probably) probabilistic to a large extent, specially concerning environmental exposure, there's more acceptance recently into cancer having a metabolic component, many cancer and metabolic related pathways cross (eg fasting/insulin/igf-1). So it's not necessarily just lottery, or rather, we still don't know how large of an factor the lottery part actually is.

teekert• 10 years ago

Just one example: About 12 percent of women in the general population will develop breast cancer sometime during their lives. By contrast, according to the most recent estimates, 55 to 65 percent of women who inherit a harmful BRCA1 mutation and around 45 percent of women who inherit a harmful BRCA2 mutation will develop breast cancer by age 70 years. These estimations are a bit in flux, I've heard much higher ones in the past.

(http://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/genetic...)

ktRolster2• 10 years ago

does it really mean most cancers are just not preventable?

It really makes me want to go eat some bacon and cheetos.

bhouston2• 10 years ago

If 45% are preventable, then are the rest NOT?

We will find out more causes of cancer as time goes on. And then more will be preventable. I am sure that environmental pollution causes are a big one that isn't included in this report -- and also various chemicals we encounter in our daily lives (soaps, etc) are likely contributing to cancer as well.

sliverstorm• 10 years ago

Ordinary soap? That seems like a stretch.

entee• 10 years ago

It's really hard to figure out whether to trust this study, I can't find a link to anything that's been published/peer reviewed on the OP link. These kinds of epidemiological studies are incredibly difficult, and easy to get wrong.

There is a good paper on this topic though:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v529/n7584/full/nature1...

draw_down• 10 years ago

Problem is figuring out which behaviors, and which foods not to eat.

Outdoorsman• 10 years ago

My guess is that we all have predispositions to developing certain types of cancer....consider the medical histories of your grandparents, parents, and siblings for (approximate) guidance...

Your grandparents and parents provide a good real-world "preview" of the possibility(s) that genetic make-up might predispose one to certain infirmities, illnesses, cancers...

Maybe you should be on guard against those evidenced, to the extent possible...after all, you're very much like them...?

Did they live a life that eventually led to any medical conditions they experienced...?

Should you avoid the life choices that they made...?

rhinoceraptor• 10 years ago

Pretty much everyone agrees on the basics: avoid white flour, sugar and processed foods. Get enough sleep, get sunlight and exercise.

nikolay7• 10 years ago

Most importantly - don't overeat and try to stick with eating within 6-8 hours a day, i.e. one or two meals only, no snacking, no liquid foods (soda, juices).

chrisamiller2• 10 years ago

Here: - Stop smoking, - keep active and at a healthy weight range - reduce red meat consumption (and barbecued/charred food) - reduce your alcohol intake - wear sunscreen.

Boom - you've just covered most of the risks that you can control.

randycupertino• 10 years ago

Also, don't live near a major highway or in smoggy city.

ars• 10 years ago

There are way more. For example avoid most hair care and beauty products. They often are full of barely tested chemicals with unknown effects.

There's a reason chemophobia is a thing - most of the chemicals in household products are not tested, and many of them are suspected carcinogens.

Obviously it's not necessary to go all the way to chemophobia, but a little caution would not hurt.

ktRolster2• 10 years ago

plus eat a lot of vegetables

Geee• 10 years ago

And don't eat antioxidants... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10983214

dawhizkid• 10 years ago

I always find it ironic when I see people fundraising for cancer research by selling doughnuts.

timje1• 10 years ago

The worst has surely got to be the 'Buckets for the Cure' campaign by KFC.

http://media.onsugar.com/files/2010/04/16/5/301/3019466/0d0b...

jrjarrett• 10 years ago

Worse:

Bake sales to raise funds for diabetes research.

mberning• 10 years ago

I am very curious how they can come to the conclusion that unhealthy eating (whatever that means) contributes to cancer. There is so much tied up in that statement. Let's put aside the fact that dietary guidelines for a healthy diet are dubious at best. How would they determine that a person that contraced cancer had an unhealthy diet? Did they simply look at the weight or perhaps the perennially maligned BMI? Did they rely on self reporting? Did they account for changes in diet across the entire lifetime? It is just crazy to think about all the ways that the foundation for such a claim could be faulty.

manmal2• 10 years ago

Probably having more than 50g sugar per day etc? While the decade-long saturated-acid-bashing is controversial, there are things that are proven to help longevity, like eating fatty fish regularly or not eating more than you spend.

alextgordon• 10 years ago

50g sugar is like 2.5 apples.

joeyspn• 10 years ago

I was going to post this... it's about time until the WHO classifies added sugars in the same carcinogenic category as cigarettes... what is happening in the food industry is simply bizarre. Artificial sweeteners aren't the solution either...

nradov• 10 years ago

Some of the conclusions come from the Nurses' Health Study. The researchers have enough long term data to establish correlations between diet and certain diseases. http://www.channing.harvard.edu/nhs/

ucaetano• 10 years ago

Absolutely all cancers are linked to being alive, which is an easily preventable factor.

jensen123• 10 years ago

I wonder how long it will take before we'll see more studies on dairy and IGF-1 and how they affect cancer. I seriously doubt that it's a coincidence that the Nordic countries have some of the highest cancer rates in the world, since they also drink the most milk. Or that the people with the Laron syndrome are resistant to cancer, since (if I remember correctly) they have some sort of defect in their IGF-1 receptors.

T. Colin Campbell talks a bit about this in his books (China Study etc.). I think he's correct that there is some sort of taboo against questioning dairy and protein.

Edit: I should probably mention that IGF-1 is a growth hormone. Cow's milk contains a lot of IGF-1. You know, those calves are pretty small when they are born, but are supposed to grow into full-size cows. Both humans and cows have receptors for the very same IGF-1.

erkkie4• 10 years ago

Also I wonder if type of dairy (fermented/processed/etc) serve as additional confounders.

PS do not forget sunlight/vitamin D levels if speaking about Nordic countries specifically not just dairy. Also a known cancer risk factor.

tokenadult• 10 years ago

I made sure to read all the previous comments here and the article kindly submitted to open the thread before posting this comment. I see the article links to a related website[1] with interactive advice on how to reduce risk of cancer, based on the study findings. That website has a page that sums up research has been showing for years, in multiple different studies:

"Research suggests that only 5 to 10% of cancers run in families. Some factors, like age, are outside our control, and some we just don’t know about yet.

"The really good news is that up to 45% of cancer in Alberta is caused by factors we can control.

"So while it’s not possible to completely prevent getting cancer, there are many proven things we can do to greatly reduce our risk. This is what cancer prevention is all about."

As I look at the site's advice, I see

Eat Healthy (I should still do a bit more to reduce calories while increasing dietary fiber from vegetables and whole grains, but I'm mostly on that already)

Prevent HPV Infections (I've got this covered)

Get Screened (some screening programs are useless, actually, but I participate in the screening programs with proven benefit)

Limit UV Rays (easy to do in Minnesota in the winter)

Live Tobacco-Free (I have always done that)

Be Active (I exercise moderately every day)

Maintain a Healthy Weight (I can improve on this a little)

Drink Less Alcohol (I go weeks at a time without drinking at all, and have never been drunk)

and control other risk factors, which I do.

You could do all of this too.

[1] http://albertapreventscancer.ca/

EvanPlaice• 10 years ago

Really? Half of all cancers? Really!?

I would love to see a research organization attempt to come up with a single, comprehensive, complete list of all cancers first.

What I read from this is, somebody was given 3/4 of a million to prove something that's already known. Moderate exercise, not having unprotected hookups with randos, and not eating shit all the time will make your body more healthy.

The only thing novel sbout this study is they added, '...for cancer sufferers'.

Study finds almost half of all cancers linked to preventable factors

Related Stories