zarp

Sent from my iPhone

Spoiler: the author is an OpenClaw instance.

it seems pretty random as to when it decides to drop that out of context

Overcoming this kind of nondeterministic behavior around creating/following/modifying instructions is the biggest thing I wish I could solve with my LLM workflows. It seems like you might be able to do this through a system of Claude Code hooks, but I've struggled with finding a good UX for maintaining a growing and ever-changing collection of hooks.

Are there any tools or harnesses that attempt to address this and allow you to "force" inject dynamic rules as context?

Solving this problem is far outside my expertise (and pay grade) but it seems like properly constructed incentives would help.

I didn't know how bad I needed this until I read it. Thank you.

Definitely agree that important problems like this require diverse opinions and meaningful dialogue, but I don't feel that pointing out the failures of human institutions is an attempt to shut down discussion.

Rather, I think the point being made was that we need to reframe the problem at hand; instead of trying to "control misinformation" maybe we need to work on ways to _amplify_ true information in ways that render misinformation powerless.

I found myself in a similar situation to yours... and then had a second child. If I had the time to track it, I'm sure the results would not be much better. After that much needed wake up call, what did you end up doing?

Technology is making anonymity nearly impossible in all facets of life and I don't think that's healthy for human development.

This sentiment is dying at an alarming rate. Even here, after reading some of these comments I am taken aback at how normalized the idea of total surveillance has become. It doesn't matter where it comes from, big corp or big gov, taking away personal privacy takes away a fundamental part of what makes us human. It's not healthy. It's not right.

Fight this.