yuuu

nobody asked

coup

noooooooo he’s the billionaire with a heart of gold nooooooooo he’s just a sweet old man who likes mcdonald’s!!!!

AI performed the mathematical verification

That should be done by the human writing the manuscript, i.e., you.

From the manuscript linked in your profile:

The author declares the intensive and extensive use of Gemini 2.5 Flash and Gemini 3.0 Pro (Google) and sincerely thanks its unlimited interlocution capacity. The author declares as their own responsibility the abstract formulation of the research, the conceptual guidance, and the decision-making in case of intellectual dilemma. The AI performed the mathematical verification of the multiple hypotheses considered throughout the process, but the author is solely responsible for the final content of this article. The prompts are not declared because they number in the thousands, because they are not entirely preserved, and because they contain elements that are part of the author’s privacy.

we will see something similar to what is shown in Fig. 1–1

In your penultimate sentence, why did you put the period outside the parentheses instead of inside?

To gain 400 pounds of muscle mass.

temper

This will become transparent

No it won't.

I don't get why people keep saying its style will start to become recognizable. You can have it write things in any number of styles and levels of verbosity.

Just wanted to say I appreciate your comment and your spreadsheet. Thank you.

The subset you're talking about is the union of extremely non-native English speakers and native English speakers over 120 years old.

For that matter, people call themselves "gay" for "joyous".

Uh... I don't think people do that anymore.

Transfer learning, NEXT!

However, at some level you have to admit that the input to ChatGPT is almost as high level as directives from project managers, and the output is almost low level enough to simply input directly into source control.

This is the part that is going to change the way people work in fundamental ways very quickly. It will turn good software developers into non-shitty project managers, project managers into ?, and mediocre developers into ?.

No. Because I like money.

wane

If by "spray pattern" you mean bursts of three shots, sure. But this thing is not playing like a pro in any respect.

It being up to them and them being stupid and lazy are not mutually exclusive. Your points stand, and my points stand.

Just read this since you aren't familiar with the context: https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Desktop/issues/1758

The Signal developers don't even provide RPM- or AppImage-based installers, despite being able to create the latter in their build pipeline. I'm never donating anything to them because I'm convinced they're lazy and stupid.

compliments

deserts

You give a prompt and it makes the thing.

Yeah, that's an ad.

You have a good point. I tend to not entertain ideas based on overused strawman comparisons with Hitler and Nazis.

It’s unclear what you’re trying to say. All aspects of Puritanism are bad because some people did violent things, historically? Nobody’s arguing with the latter, and the comment you originally responded to was, “We are free to pick and choose what we think is worth preserving or adopting.”

All aspects of Puritanism are “dependent on violent overthrow of competing ideologies?”

“dependent on” != “associated with”