HN user

yeswecan

39 karma
Posts0
Comments13
View on HN
No posts found.

That's a terrible argument. I still write and read Python with libraries that use C (for example: the entire standard library). If you want an example that fits the point you are trying to make, consider Lua/C, where you _can_ mix the two easily.

The point is still flawed, though - CoffeeScript is not JavaScript, and I have no interest in learning it (I'd rather spend the time learning to write better JS myself). I, and everyone else with my mindset, has their time wasted by this mislabelling; we would not have clicked through if the title said CoffeeScript.

That means all links under list items in the unordered list with the id "social", including non direct children (e.g. an <a> inside an <em> inside a <p> as well as just an <a> inside an <li>).

One can imagine the hypothetical scenario where a large filling station network would offer a battery subscription service of sorts, whereby you can stop at a station, swap in a charged battery, and drive off.

If you are using <ul> and <li> elements for your links it's one fewer tag in your HTML:

    <ul class="nav">
        <li></li>
    </ul>
vs
    <nav>
        <ul>
            <li></li>
        </ul>
    </nav>

The only 'danger' is that if someone is specifically looking at your page specifically for <nav> tags to locate your navigation they won't find it.

The only way to guarantee it is to have an HTML tag to identify the fraction - <frac>11/63</frac> or similar.

Let us not forget that GitHub is a major reason why people choose Git. If Bitbucket (or a hypothetical HgHub) had taken the larger market share first, we'd likely see more projects using Hg than Git.

Bullshit 15 years ago

Perhaps if you conflate "users want to associate themselves, from time to time, with brands" and "users want to interact with brands".