xanax

I don't think that's the right link mate. I got redirected.

I used to have a Canon Powershot for taking photos and videos before I had a smartphone with a good camera. Once I got an iPhone 7, carrying around a camera with comparable image quality just wasn't worth it anymore. I have an 8 right now, and the only cameras that substantially better quality cost about as much as a 12, which also has a good camera. Unless you are willing to splurge, the superior battery life, size, and utility of your phone will probably outclass any camera you are looking at.

I think he's saying that most apple products are not worth the money and that he sees the Max as another example of it.

Well at least he's alive. I was a bit worried that he'd gotten whacked by the CCP.

I like this. The more free information the better.

I would still stay away from Facebook even with this. That platform is a data miner. Nothing more, nothing less.

Facebook is much bigger so the amount of upset users will be greater as well if it is removed. Plus all the big tech CEOs have their own little club so I doubt apple would mess with Facebook like that.

Optical Tweezers. Basically people use lasers to move microscopic particles around. Lasers can also levitate things. Here's a really interesting video on this topic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sq7GaO8iqu8

Yes. The influence they would have if the large parts of the world depended on them for internet and communications is insane.

^this

It's usually been in the government's best interest to fund and lend a hand to companies like these. SpaceX can't exist without government funding for the time being and probably quite a bit of time in the future. When they do manage to get people to mars it will be even more so in the government's interest to fund them.

The stereotypical description is a circular object that can hover and make sharp directional changes. Usually they're described as having lights and sometimes as having no seams or visible rivets.