vitorfblima

most "information problems" are by design, specially when dealing with speculative markets.

There's always an excuse...

Well, from my experience, if the AI dev is ill intended, he can just say nothing then the exec will go "we can ship now as it is!"

Yes, I don't know why it's being downvoted so much.

Smoking and eating unhealthy food are constraints to life! ;)

People who love me have told me many times that I'm "shitty" at something. Guess it dependes where you're coming from.

I'm quite confused by this. Is calling someone a "stinky manager" a personal attack? It's funny that we can't differentiate the person from his "job". I work with some shitty managers, but I don't hold it against them on a personal level...

Let me check real quick with ChatGPT if you are being sarcastic or not.

As expected from "the Hub", an empty clickbaity headline, a phony "apology" to save face, etc.

more than half a dozen, probably, so safe to say there could be as much as ten.

Since he is explicitly comparing 2026 to 1926 I think his statement holds up.

I guess it's showing user's location, maybe simulating their cursor in some way, but I don't know for sure how he's doing this.

That "freedom" has a cost, a very high one (in the form of tokens), and that money is going to powerful corporations anyways.

That's part of it, sure, but the starting narrative has always been to make people more productive.

Not in the speed and scale you would imagine, luckily.

You guessed it.

I'm on board with what you're saying, but that's not what I'm going for. Right now, "Markets" need to believe that future nannies will be robots

We're talking about ALL labor.

The untold promise of IA is to replace labor. That's probably the only reason why some people are willing to spend trillions of dollars in pursuing this technology. Mere tools would never justify this kind of investment. It's no surprise that people are getting angry, even though many are using AI in their everyday life.

Prompted and delivered!

This commenter seems fishy (AI).

Not a bug, a feature.

This is all common knowledge, unfortunately.

Exactly. So many people missing the whole point.

This. The survelliance state smiles when people find ok to film their neighbors for "safety" purposes.

Well, well, well, seems you're onto something here.

Most people wouldn't want to be constantly bothered by an agent unsolicited. Just my 1 cent.

Back in the old twitter days you could have screenshots of your tweets being displayed by a number of different 'dubious' accounts on instagram, completely out of your control.

That's just how things work, I guess.

Back in the day I used to log in to a MUSH called Elendor (telnet).

It was simply magical and I have many good memories venturing through middle-earth and meeting fellow chars.

I don't see how less video time for people would harm innovation.

If you, like me and most people I know, hate ads, why would it be a bad thing to limit it?

What are we expecting to actually accomplish with all this platform growth thing?