vietvu

What is important or right today might not be tomorrow. The problem that you think today did not exist at the moment of decision. Even if you turn back time, you would likely do the same (unless with today knowledge). Why resent?

You can just `uv venv`? Or even uvx?

Yes, agree. At first I still use pyenv, or mise to manage python version, now that uv does that, uv is the only tool I need for everything in Python env.

Me too. Aren't we already doing this? This is the basic I have been taught first.

It's ok, just don't use them anymore if you don't like it. I will switch to something else.

Quite sad to see devs nowadays has lost abilities to self-host. I know it can be overwhelming with Linux, networking, db, backup, hardware load.... However, it's not rocket science!

I heard this opinion a lot recently. Codex is getting better, and Claude is getting worse so it's must happen sooner or later. Well, it's competition so waiting for Claude to catch up. The web Claude Code is good, but they really need to fix their quota. It's unusable. I would choose a worse model (maybe at 90%), but has better quota and usable. Not to mention GPT-5 and GPT-5-codex seems catch up or even better now.

For Zed user, yes. They don't care (I too, didn't use Windows for years, but Windows is popular is a fact, not opinion).

What I meant was there are so many problems with Windows that the team cannot do it quickly (they post about it before: https://zed.dev/blog/windows-progress-report).

Just surprised, as I thought building GUI app on Windows must be easy right, as must be libs/frameworks already available to support that? It's just not.

I didn't know bundling app for the most popular OS is that hard.

and replace first, second... with 1st, 2nd...

Or paying deepseek for slightly cheaper and worse performance than OpenAI.

Because no one use Gemini Advanced.

I used to have pyenv, asdf or mise to manage python versions (never use conda unless I need DL lib like pytorch). Now just uv is enough.

LLMs like GPT are heavy and costly (and BERT are LLMs too, params can up to like 1.5B). For niche problems like classification on a small domain, BERT like models are much better, cheaper. You don't need all knowledge gen AI LLM has. I have seen many companies using DeBERTa or RoBERTa for text classification, not using GPT/LLaMA.

So that what's Jeremy Howard was teasing about. Nice one.

Another llama.cpp and mistral.rs? If it support vision models then fine, I will try it.

EDIT: Looks like no L3.2 11B yet.

OK, I will wait for like a month before update.

I felt weird reading the titles too, because maybe 2-3 years ago I have downloaded with `curl`, so why this? And also, I am pretty sure `wget` can do it and better too.

The repo is terrible at tell us what is this about, the landing page is better: https://pico.sh, but still terrible.

I haven't used duckdb since I got OOM on my dataset too. I think I will try again on 1.0.

Used Superset back in 2016 and 2020; both time chose Metabase for our clients' BI dashboard and Superset for our internal dashboard. Superset is nice, easy to modify and extend but not user friendly as Redash or Metabase. But after the author launched Preset, it seems to have improved much with the company effort. It looks like to me the best way for OSS to advance is to have a company dedicated to improve it.

And how frequent you write to SD card too. My Pi 3B+ have been running for 3 years. Haven't considered to upgrade since my need is small.

After over 10 years since I started using CSS, nothing changed. Center div still hard.

Maybe it got better but when I was using RN, it felt fine at the first 3 months; then we found out that it is a hell to work with JS and React Native dependency. To the point we needed to forked multiple project to make it worked. And in the end, we still need a considerable native code for our app. It might just be better to start from scratch with native iOS/Android.

So he will change the company from Meta to AI? Since the company shifted from metaverse to AI.

It's fine to me. Tech UI is bad and weird, but not like if you gain 5x customers with better UX.

Not with eager API.

Last time I check Firefox on Mobile still break sites' layout and not render video player properly (cannot touch seek and play/pause button, it's under view window) on my Samsung Note 10. I love Firefox but it needs to be at least usable.

Damn, when I decided that I don't want a mechanical watch anymore, you convince me otherwise with this.

Is it working now? I used for about half a year until MacOS Sonoma when it breaks and I had enough. MacOS is just not built for customization, it's frustrating.