vibrato2

Kinda like ivermectin with the same mechanism

Danger to whom? The adults have their vaccine and the kids aren’t susceptible

This death number constantly trotted out is such misinformation.

The vast majority of those people died from morbidities at exactly the age they were expected to.

They admitted plenty of times that any positive test within a month of death means the death is regarded as a covid death.

Plus hospitals have monetary incentives to record these covid deaths.

The excess death rate, adjusted for population age, was almost negligible in 2020

I call bullshit. Your source doesn’t address the efficacy decrease at all.

Yes, there are lasting changes from the vaccine, no that doesn’t indicate much about level of protection.

I definitely would never get a flu shot with its ridiculous efficacy numbers. If you forced me to get it to remain a part of society it would require my resistance by any means.

If you didn’t respond like an asshole id give you a couple sources. But, bullshit and all.

Except we had to change the definition of “working vaccine” to fit these new therapies.

Traditionally a vaccine has to keep efficacy for a year. We haven’t got a year of data but the efficacy has dropped significantly

The lack of proof of causation isn’t evidence for simple correlation.

Misinformation doesn’t exist.

Lies are real information.

I know I'd prefer it to living under tyranny. Liberty or Death.

Clothing is not permanent. Injections are.

With these specific therapies: 1) Myocarditis (long term heart damage) 2) general inflammation and clot risk 3) long term risks of brand new mRNA technology

For myself and other young athletes, my research leads me to understand that the vaccine is higher risk than the infection.

My greatest concern is the totalitarianism behind vaccine passports. At this point even if the shot cured cancer I wouldn't take it because of how it's pushed.

I haven't seen any serious attempt to address the concerns with the "vaccines". Only ostracism and censorship.

Plus a healthy dose of disinformation about the safety and efficacy profiles of these therapies.

If the science is so clear, why not give an anti vaxxer a huge prime time platform and embarrass them in debate?

The only disinformation I've seen about these vaccines has been from Fauci and other pro vaxxers.

“You’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations.” - Joe Biden

there was never a basis for this statement, making it clear disinformation. Grass roots research doesn't fit the bill of what that word means.

And by science we mean the profitable stuff. Like the most profitable pharma therapies ever offered.

Remember when they discontinued the control groups? I thought Randomized controlled trials were the gold standard for science

There’s a lot of video evidence to the contrary on your beach claim.

Personally I was nearly run over by a police suv and tackled off my skateboard at noon by an officer in a major American city for violating park closure.

United States federal interstate system

What’d he claim that’s wrong?

CDC regards as unvaccinated until 2 weeks post treatment. So any acute vaccine reaction is regarded as an unvaccinated hospitalization.

When they’re using a non diagnostic test to categorize them, yes. It doesn’t count.

So what? It’s asserting an analysis that the vaccine is killing people.

Doctors have an obligation to report adverse events on VAERS, which they don’t actually seem to be doing very frequently as far as reactions are seen.

How? There’s no data

Live virus vaccines are actually a proven technology. I'd much sooner take a live virus than rushed to market mRNA technology.

https://www.verywellhealth.com/what-is-a-live-virus-vaccine-...

I added a source but hacker news isn’t fond of analysis or thinking in regards to political issues; it was flagged.

Now apply that to long term vaccine safety.

Ooh hitchens is fun when his logic goes against theistic religion. Not so enjoyed when it works against the modern religion of scientism.

He’s one of the good people who can tell us the right way to do things. Never mind the 150k vaccine deaths.

Or doubling the money supply in a year. Not exactly an unrelated event like a hat drop

Did you miss the data point that boys are 6x more likely to be affected from the therapy than the illness?

Preventing the spread of an infectious respiratory virus is a fools errand and we’ve known this forever. No amount of authoritarianism is enough to stop the spread. The mitigation efforts were always to avoid overrunning the hospitals, which we have managed easily.

It'd be useful if you linked to them.

Here's a human study referring to their safety. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043740/

communities.win

You compared it to crystals, which are not recognized by the scientific community for anything.

As you can see from my posted study, there is a lot of evidence that ivermectin is efficacious against covid, and some that it isn’t. I suspect those are similar to the now retracted study denigrating Hydroxychloroquine

Except ivermectin won the 2015 Nobel prize in medicine.

The minute crystals win the Nobel prize in medicine, let me know. I’ll buy a nice stock.