HN user

vertline3

372 karma

Tired of the know-it-alls.

Posts0
Comments251
View on HN
No posts found.

There is a documentary from BBC about the history of philosophy of happiness that was on YouTube, in the documentary it is mentioned that the Greek Philosphers had discussed advertising as lowering our happiness in order to replace the hole with their product. I think it was epicurus but I am not certain. the narrator is Alain de Botton

Guide to Deep Work 7 years ago

I don't think it is different from a work of high craftsmanship such as Chinese Jade carving. But maybe from a kind of labor that is non-skilled.

Guide to Deep Work 7 years ago

I think that the idea of prioritizing work that is adding significant value is not so new, to be fair. Professors would go on sabbaticals to finish their book for instance.

Guide to Deep Work 7 years ago

What is being branded "Deep Work", was just work before the electronics arrived. Really shows how the new mediums have eroded our attention span.

[dead] 7 years ago

He started out strong with that witty application to the ex-boyfriend list. However, once the Lady said she was with a surgeon, that was probably the clue that it was time to bow out. Really enjoyed this, but felt a bit of sympathy for Richard.

"if there is an issue, and what is the main issue of using the syntax of Lambda calculus as the basis of a programming language"

have you used scheme?

From wikipedia

"Scheme is a very simple language, much easier to implement than many other languages of comparable expressive power. This ease is attributable to the use of lambda calculus to derive much of the syntax of the language from more primitive forms."

The idea of small rules leading to large patterns is not something Wolfram invented, but he seems to think he did. I think Conway's game of life predates it, as does Mandelbrot, then there is the Durer pentagon.

Maybe there is a something I am missing though?

So my understanding is he believes math is invented, and exists in a "neo-fictional" space where things can be both true and false. Because if it were pure fiction like Star Trek then Math's statements would be false.

To me this seems a bit off, but I'll assume that it's my understanding of what he is trying to say that is flawed.

Also, didn't we all use the unit circle in Calc?