HN user

userforcomment

11 karma
Posts0
Comments16
View on HN
No posts found.

> Devs, while you are waiting for access right now, over 70 YC companies from the latest W23 batch are ‘AI companies.’

Disagree, got API access relatively early after announcement, have nothing to do with YC. But my suspicion is that some of YC batch got OpenAI API credits to use those, otherwise e.g. phind.com would go out of funding while ago.

This. Owning ~20% of normal stocks and ~60% of voting stocks shouldn't be allowed for public company. At some point company becomes just CEO's toy to do things they want, in this case "metaverse".

Not sure about Holodomor, but famine in Kazakhstan which killed almost half of population was real. Third of population fled to China during the 1929-1933 and still remain there. To be honest though while Stalin is cruel, he is more comparable to Kim Jong Un than Hitler.

I support direction of AI control, but I think focusing on size/compute isn't productive at all. Use cases are more important: let it control browser on itself, let execute arbitrary code etc. Depending on capabilities of next GPT versions, opening GPT API could be risky.

Why not IDE suggestions: not auto-completions(already use gh copilot, latency is so high) but more of advanced linter suggestions?

Would love to this evolve into sourcery.ai-like product. Or sourcery.ai could benefit from ChatGPT/Codex.