ugexe

The pro cyclist mayor in the city I live in didn’t do that. I guess our personal anecdotes cancel out.

Only on the internet, where most of us (maybe even yourself) have the majority of our discussions?

What audits?

How does that make it improbable?

But why did you code it to fetch stars at all? You would have had to go out of your way to do that. If AI has written most of this I suspect people will be less inclined to contribute.

MTGO does not use the same shuffler as MTGA

The AI player just casts the first card it has the mana to cast, regardless of if any normal player would do it. As an example Sparky will gladly cast a kill spell on their own creature if the opponent has none, or cast protection spells on the opponents creatures if it has no creatures itself. This is far different than duels of the planewalkers.

Do you have any evidence of this? IIRC it is completely expected for users to consume it — https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/community/t...

Thanks Jerry, you’ve managed to finally get me to switch off google search for good! It seemed quite a difficult thing to do in the past, but finally something has clicked that made it feel like the natural thing to do.

Are you sure its a tarnished lead? Lots of lightning cables have one tarnished lead (often on each side) from arcing. If I remember correctly using such a cable in a new iPhone could even damage the matching pin inside the phone, leading to the situation where it would start arcing on a non-broken cable (damaging the same leads on the new cable).

It is possible that some pairs of said glasses were flawed -- and as such detrimental -- while other benign pairs were not.

Saying “the evidence” without supplying any evidence isn’t going to further your point

On the other side of the coin I hate looking at git blame to find a bunch of now irrelevant stuff, like fixes to code that were only ever in your branch. I don’t generally care about the discoveries you made along the way (at least not in commit form) unless I’m doing the review for it to go in the main branch, and even then it’s more of a curiosity than anything particularly relevant to software quality.

Is it that hard to believe lego might not market one of their products towards boys?

Why do you think rumor mongering is a valid reason for a country to disable people’s internet?

Rare? Half the videos I watch have those ads for Raid Shadow Legends, some random vpn, and a bunch of others that are totally disconnected from the general topics discussed on the channel containing the ad

So if every single piece of hardware or software followed this one crazy trick the world would be better because some people at a tech company wouldn’t have to field as many support questions?

Just because they don’t require it doesn’t mean it isn’t being considered a negative or positive thing against you in the future.

There are block lists for DoH servers and other DNS queries can be forwarded to your own resolver.

Because trump told his followers to not submit mail in ballots. Since this has been pointed out to you multiple times I’m curious why you think his supporters would mail in ballots despite their candidates plea not to?

Are you going to offer any supporting evidence at least like the post you are rebuking? All of human history seems to suggest violence is the most available resource for achieving any sort of change.

If Apple or Google are ok with that then there is no legal reason they couldn’t. Of course “works somewhere else” isn’t a protected class, so how those employers respond to that arrangement is entirely up to them.

Yes the article explicitly states that alumni, whom the author consider a privileged class, also have .edu emails

So your idea is to always gives malicious actors additional information for account take overs so you can use an account with a non zero post count (not just non-zero, but only 1 or 2 as you insinuated)? Do you not see how naive that is?

Those users are already creating new email accounts, so creating a new e.g. FooApp account shouldn’t seem unreasonable to those users.

I don’t think you having to either A) remember what email you used or B) creating a new account is a big ask when the alternative is leaking your account presence on a given system. Not everyone wants other people to be able to essentially query a given app for an email account.

That isn’t an apt comparison — Kneeling on someone’s neck is never going to save countless lives.

Because someone choosing to have unsafe sex and getting aids isn’t going to give their e.g. grandma aids. They are choosing to risk themselves, which is not the same as risking others that have not chosen to partake in the risky behavior. This may be hard to reconcile for those who think the world revolves around them.

So can you answer the original question when you are done taking it so personally for whatever reason?

Can you answer the original question without trying to deflect it with an unrelated question?