thrown1212

And a reminder that enshitification began long, long ago.

Anti-trust not anti trust

I have the same question. It’s hard to judge from the outside like this but there are Trump-ian displays of arrogance, disconnection and incompetence that seem at odds with his massive successes with SpaceX and Tesla in particular. He’s clearly book smart, but seems like a petulant, chronically insecure man-child in most areas from the accounts both public and insider. I find the incongruence strange.

A case study in why this problem persists.

It’s a cheap, viable, vetted user acquisition model. For most startups it’s about the best CAC you can get without investing in channel development. Close enough to none of them are OSI open source, it’s all source available or open core, laying the cynicism bare.

Women too.

I have no doubt they will implement WEI, but it will not bring security.

This is precisely OP’s point. WEI will quickly dominate despite having nothing to do with securing anyone.

No it doesn’t. Anyone can take AGPL code and wrap it up as a SaaS. AGPL forces you to publish changes even as a SaaS which GPL does not. But that doesn’t close the AWS problem that Elastic and others faced.

They’ll consort with an inner circle of “industry” accomplices to “address concerns”, keeping everyone out while covering the “we consulted widely” angle. This will get pushed through under cover of darkness with enough of a fig leaf of due process to plausible deny anything other than good intent.

If you’re working on this, shame on you.

And more precisely: “Safety margins are inefficiencies”

This short statement is profound and bears repeating slowly and often to people in any kind of power.

The “EU bad” line gets rolled out so often on HN it has become its own truth. “Everyone knows” that the EU tech industry is getting strangled by its technocratic regulators and that’s why the EU fails at tech har har look at these idiots. Etc.

They meant “linear.app”, not Jira, and “copy” instead of alternative.

There’s currency in this type of knock off. Find a well executed closed source app, clone as open source, pick an alternative pitch “the Jira killer”, then raise YC because open core is the fashionable argument.

This is the entire point

Because when you own the land you can just tax the serfs who do that work. Rentierism is the ultimate goal of capitalism.

It makes them safer, including when driving near cars. Lobby for no training if you want but don’t pretend like it doesn’t help.

They’re the admiral of their peers in this space, no doubt of that.

Exit through the gift shop. A tale about the commoditisation of what people thought was art. This is that. Indie game devs are the legions of graffiti artists whose purity and form will never pay the bills, regardless of how superior their underlying passion or technique is. Because money don’t care.

There are two types of game developers: those who spend their time making tools to make games and those who spend their time making games. So really there is only one type of game developer.

I’m calling this shit out using your comment because it’s the straw (sorry).

This poor man’s Pascal’s Wager I see all over the place is pathetic. Stare into the eyes of the basilisk man, die on your feet. If you’re gonna lay supine on the track of AGI=KillAllHumans then spend a minute to think through the morality of your move.

Apostasy is a poisoned chalice. Fuck the machine.

Your response explains SO much about why this is a dumpster fire. Rather than a professional "these are some valid concerns, we may have made some serious mistakes and this deserves a credible response", here's how your defensive commentary was received by at least one person:

"Public criticism (however valid) of something I worked on hurts my feelings. Just so you know, we already thought through ALL these possible "problems" (and more) and we chose the "one true way". So your criticisms are just, waves hands, whatever.

Plus, these "issues" could never happen anyway (just try it lol!), so your criticisms are basically imaginary. Also and anyway this is YOUR fault (not mine, no!) because YOU wanted extensions. Also, also: the other guys were worse. Your fault, shame on you, other guys worse, I'm a good person.

And finally, this is hard work, no-one ever said thank you to me."

I’ve hit this (add a new number to verify) more than once. The security theatre of it all is painful.

I’ve gone all in on Cloudflare for my “stack”. R2, durable objects, D1, queues, logs, Pages and Workers. It all works beautifully, out the box, dev env baked in (wrangler), Internet scale.

If you find yourself using reallyLongKeywordChainsForIdentifiers then you're probably coding in Java and now you have two problems.

It violates nothing. Your intuitions are expanded at length here http://grabbyaliens.com

Any first degree negative feedback loops. But reality has a way of poking its head in, like getting booed in public forums that should have been adoring you.

Fortunately second and third degree feedback loops are notoriously stupid, and wrong, and they’re the problem there, not you.

Over-weighting over-fitting pattern matches because you believe you’re quite clever. It’s a soft case of what happens when you’re stoned.

It’s a don’t ask don’t tell policy. The rivers of money tend to wash over objections. The culpability should be the same, but there’s enough cover that people will say things like you just did, with a straight face.

Because if you don’t like it, you’re the ass. But, if it’s bad, they’re the ass.

Few people bother to climb the steep wall of cognitive dissonance required to embrace the fact that the source of their problem might be intrinsic. Much easier to paint your displeasure in the palette of extrinsic and objective failures.

You’re still an ass, but at least you don’t have to think of yourself as one.