throwaway198846

I would argue traditional media need subsidies similar to those that exist in most democratic states for healthcare

I meant the worse part

Eisenkot or Bennett take up the mantle, which is arguably worse.

As far as I'm aware there is no reason to believe so

"Netanyahu is universally pardoned, but must GTFO of the country and leave politics entirely"

Such an option was offered to him and was refused.

There is no amount of nuclear capability that can stop a party you are major threat to from attacking you. See Hamas attacking Israel. Of course Iran will still enrich uranium because they are an excellent negotition leverage.

How much land do data center use and of which type of land?

These are not new or unpredictable impacts.

What do you think my username mean? Some kind of a dog whistle? In reality it is me misremembering 196884 from monstrous moonshine.

When was the USA a high trust society?

Automated theorem provers can't prove this problem. Which non-trivial Math problem you think are thougher than this Erdos problem?

Sometimes I really don't get why my comment is downvoted.

I kind of agree with you there is only enough area for solar for 150 million people (even if we assume all land is solarable) but there is no reasons we couldn't eventually have everyone with a milion Claudes with fusion.

Edit: There is a problem with that - 10MW * 8 billion is something like half the solar power from the sun which implies wasted heat will heat earth considerably.

Can you show me a recent war in a democracy where women had greater percentage of supporting a war than men?

You just made me imagine switching lanes microtransactions as a solution which made my soul shudder in a deep seated disgust, so I had to share it.

fractional tempi sounds fascinating

Is there a service I can upload a file and get one made and shipped to me? Not necessarily this grament language but others. I have an old and unusual garment I want in an adult size.

They have exceptions for manufacturing defects

Well one link deeper says "Restrict the export of textile waste" but I'm still unclear why they preferred these measure over a carbon tax.

Edit: "To prevent unintended negative consequences for circular business models that involve the sale of products after their preparation for reuse, it should be possible to destroy unsold consumer products that were made available on the market following operations carried out by waste treatment operators in accordance with Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council3. In accordance with that Directive, for waste to cease to be waste, a market or demand must exist for the recovered product. In the absence of such a market, it should therefore be possible to destroy the product." This is a rather interesting paragraph which seems to imply you can destroy clothes if truly nobody wants it.

Can they ship it outside the EU and then destroy it? What happens if truly nobody wants those clothes? Why not just put a carbon tax per weight?

So wikipedia is now part of the supply chain (informally) which means there is another set of people who will try to hijack Wikipedia, as if we didn't had enough, just great.

This is quite common

I feel vindicated by reverting to the old windows 10 notepad.exe

Diet is one of the very few places where your genetic ancestry actually matters

Aside from lactose intolerance what else is different between humans?

There is no way it is just "just". And we should start from simpler stuff like vitamin B12, C and D.

As a non physicist I like the idea of a moun collider more - more compact (thus should be cheaper) as well as something which haven't done in similar energy scales and therefore more likely to need new technology in building it and finding something new.

I lately used these methods and BFGS worked better than CG for me.

This space is not protected, anyone can sign up.

Or Mass spectrometry

Because someone is wrong on the internet, isn't that enough? I already explained it and I'm unsure what I can add aside from some examples (Siege of Jerusalem (starvation without destruction), Battle of Raqqa (destructive urban warfare, no allegations of starvation or war crimes), Siege of Mariupol (destructive urban warfare, many alleged war crimes))

No, you missed the point. They have been indicated to "as co-perpetrators for committing the acts jointly with others: the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare; and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts". Physical destruction can occur without being a war crime and those war crimes can occur without any destruction. So it didn't add any useful information infact it was actively misleading because some people might think they were indicated for destruction.