thomask0

His main contribution at MIT was dodgy studies that shill for Tesla... https://www.thedrive.com/tech/27359/mit-study-showing-high-f...

Except Trump/Tillersion just happily approved the biggest arms deal with Saudi, while the previous Obama administration was halting this deal because of human right violations in Yemen. Iran deal was also in the line to reduce Saudi's influence on foreign policy.

How were the polls fake when they were basically right? The state-polls for Wisconsin / Michigan in the end were wrong, but those states in the end were probably not polled enough to capture the volatility of unprecedented events like the Comey letter.

And FYI national polls predicted a 1-4% popular vote win, those where pretty much on the money.

Should not come as a surprise...

https://what.thedailywtf.com/topic/15687/code-review-maledic...

https://what.thedailywtf.com/topic/15001/enlightened

Well what's happening with all the rats leaving the ship it feels more like the "Der Ubergang"

For non-German speakers, its a pun on the German name of the the movie Downfall (Untergang), infamous for it's Hitler in the bunker clip.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downfall_(2004_film)

Looks to be 1:1 lifted from the Google style-guide

https://google.github.io/styleguide/pyguide.html

His Gmail password was probably runner4567, at least his icloud password was and he emailed it. Also not changed when that email leaked.

Just stop with the nonsense that his email password was "p@ssword", as the truth is just as stupid.

It wasn't just the presidential race either, Guccifer 2.0 (suspected Russian front) also targeted Democractic down-ballot races in the House and Senate: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/house-democra... with stuff taken from the DNC.

Or the Trump organization is much smaller than what he wants it to appear. It's mainly branding (Trump Vodka trump water, a lot of the Trump buildings), get-rich-schemes (Trump University, Trump Network) or hotels. And ofcourse the reality-tv business

With regards to infosec at his hotels, plenty of credit-card breaches https://krebsonsecurity.com/2016/04/sources-trump-hotels-bre...

https://krebsonsecurity.com/2015/07/banks-card-breach-at-tru...

His email servers run on Windows 2003 with IIS6:

http://fortune.com/2016/10/18/donald-trump-email-server-secu...

It could be there is a different answer to why nothing been released yet, eg. blackmail.

For starters it was only a 70k vote differences between the electoral college win, so about anything small could have made a difference.

The leaks itself were only small and didn't contain so much, but they were amplified with big dis-information campaign that surely must have depressed Democratic turnout to some degree. Especially the leaks focused on demotivating the former Bernie supporters, to support their (imo wrongly) narrative that the primaries were rigged against Bernie by the DNC.

No evidence that they were doctored, but there are still plenty of complete fakes that were tweeted out by others, which were taken serious by way too many people including FOX news.

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-calls-voters-bucket-of-losers/

The DOJ status hearing is one of the perfect examples of something out of WikiLeaks that was way blown out of proportion by tweeting first, ask questions later.

http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/10/11/nbc-reporter-sug...

http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/10/trump-...

On the debate thing, a Bernie senior aide came out and said that she gave guidance to Sanders campaign too. The most nefarious scenario would be that Brazile gave questions to Clinton to prop her up. The less nefarious scenario would be that Brazile from her DNC position tried to get the best out of both candidates to not embarrass the DNC.

Note that Brazile and CNN are still denying she could have gotten access to the townhall questions. I agree though that networks should not put themselves in these kind of conflict of interests, by hiring a political commentator that is paid by the DNC at the same time, or a former campaign manager that is still on the payroll of said campaign like Corey Lewandowski.

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/trailguide/la-na-trai...

Let ISP's shutdown traffic of customers with compromised devices.

Trump was boasting in that debate about nothing, they were on the same episode of 60 minutes but they were not even on the same continent for that episode.

http://time.com/4108198/donald-trump-60-minutes-putin/

Most of the things i've came across that are being brought up as bombshells are actually incoming mails from outside the campaign.

Plus there is a number of things that are being put out of context like the Hillary hates Everyday Americans thing, where it's clear from the context that it is just about the phrasing

Assange was NOT behind the Panama papers. Like you said that exposed Putin corruption so Assange called it a hitjob on Putin.

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/717670056650530816