HN user

thisoneworks

292 karma
Posts0
Comments35
View on HN
No posts found.

Imo it definitely has to do with politicians and governments trying to appear strong on the topic of protecting kids from the harms of social media. I also believe a lot of it is well intentioned, albeit poorly executed

It'll be funny when we have Robots, "The user's facial expression looks to be consenting, I'll take that as an encouraging yes"

You can frame the "unpaid voluntary labor" as "creative work" and it would start making a whole lot of sense. "Creative work thrives despite being unpaid in capitalist society."

Big part of my annoyance is the term "AI" itself which you can say to mean anything, everything and nothing. It's something that's used to oversell/hype it to grab money.. which is fine. But if engineers like us can calm the crazy rhetoric down to "llms" or "text completion" "Image-gen api" that's already a leg up in thinking clearly. Like the question "is ai going to put people out of jobs" -> "is this new crazy good text completion model going to put people out of jobs" already gets us out of the weeds somewhat.

Hah financialization strikes again. Try explaining this to a person from a third world country, they would say "what are you talking about". Also they would have better health care than your average American.

Since when did naming a country for their military action signify the opinion or inclination of the majority of civic population? When newspapers report on "country A did X" it almost always means their government did X. So I'm not sure what point you're trying to make

I honestly don't think this is all that big. What we are seeing has been possible for more than 6 months now(?) with gpt4 and elevenlabs, its just put together in a nice little demo website and with what seems like a multi-modal model(?) trained on nytimes the daily episodes lol. And no i don't think this will gain all that much traction. We will keep valuing authentic human interaction more and more.

Veo 2 years ago

Yeah that wasn't obvious what they were trying to show. Demis said feature films will be released in a while

Post-GPT Computing 3 years ago

At that point I'm pretty sure they'll already have fine tuned a "senior software engineer agent". This may sound ridiculous and yeah we probably won't get rid of the entirety of SWE ladder, but my point is we are entering the realm of science fiction now, our assumptions about labor are about to fall off a cliff. Productivity will increase through the roof, corps will make more cash, workers will suffer

Post-GPT Computing 3 years ago

You hit the nail on the head. GPT/copilot in some sense is democratization of specialized knowledge. Now on one end you'll have product engineers/managers prompt gpt to write boilerplate code of all kind, on the other end you'll have senior engineers reviewing, optimizing writing specialized code. Where do junior engineers fit? Can you be a full stack engineer? I believe it'll squeeze out all the could-be devs out of the field forever. Gender diversity/DEI? Forget it. Upward mobility? Will become much harder, you'll basically need to have a specialization to even be considered

ChatGPT Plugins 3 years ago

There might be government regulation on AI pretty soon.. it's not crazy to think GPUs and GPU tech would be treated as defense equipment some day

ChatGPT Plugins 3 years ago

Oh I'm aware of it. I do not think it holds any merit right now when we're talking about coding assistants.

ChatGPT Plugins 3 years ago

With great power comes great responsibility? Today there's nothing stopping grandmas from driving, so whatever could go wrong is already going wrong

You want guaranteed specific behavior from a software system (that's what SLAs and contracts are for) and easily reason about it so you can hire a college grad to tweak it. And that's not even talking about datasets, you can only train something accurate if you have enough good data on it? I can only see software 2.0 being a better autocorrect for internet scale usecases (in the short term atleast, until the next breakthrough)

This also reminds me of a quote from the Book I'm currently reading (Practical Wisdom by Barry Schwarz)

“Most of us think about empathy as a “feeling” or an “emotion.” It is. To be empathetic is to be able to feel what the other person is feeling. But empathy is more than just a feeling. In order to be able to feel what another person is feeling, you need to be able to see the world as that other person sees it. This ability to take the perspective of another demands perception and imagination. Empathy thus reflects the integration of thinking and feeling.”

"Mind reading" is another way to put it (https://yosefk.com/blog/people-can-read-their-managers-mind....) - this practical wisdom + mind reading is basically the salient human feature that NNs would never be able to replace so you would always have humans in the system.