theinverseidea

This explains the subset of articles blaming this on Nazis.

Works for Facebook and others.

Robinhood is a private company and can manage their platform as they see fit.

You can tell from the downvotes that proponents of this idea believe people like me do not exist.

We do. I welcome UBI and I will quit my job.

Of course, I'm not complaining.

Just stating plainly I welcome the opportunity to do it full-time.

I cant wait for basic income, because I cant wait to quit my job and focus on my ideas.

You ever try making an assessment like this in regular conversation?

Its terribly sad, and equally confusing has to how we got here.

At least they'll have a firm understanding of just how sexist light speed is.

Looks like the GME craziness is continuing and picking up Expr, AMC, and NOK.

Lots of crazy stocks right now black berry, bbby, expr, and etc. Pretty weird.

Seems the same thing is happening to some others, BBBY and EXPR.

Glad to see the market continue to open up to unexpected players.

Are you suggesting no one thing exists outside of your mind?

Turns out it was the more direct management, and senior advisors rather than just the leader of the entire country. Wow, that bit of nuance really did get by me in previous, similar, reporting.

I know some people who have been called a Nazi for less and for longer.

I would say bring back empiricism as a big component of knowing if something is true, or at least before you discuss it as something that is right.

People are aligning with complex theories with no underlying basis, other than their feelings and utopian visions, and then getting emotional about it.

This is counter intuitive, one of the things I like most about the government mandated masks is that they're so humanizing.

We must be pretty divided, it just seems reasonable.

The worlds most powerful nation adopted mail in voting, for the first time, in an election year of its most controversial President.

That alone seems rather egregious to anyone invested on that side of things I would imagine.

I always get a kick when businesses do exactly what the numbers said they would do and other people act surprised.

No

There seems to be little room for the controversial idea that nothing should have been done, other than a notice to stay in if you feel the need to worry about safety, regardless of touted death metrics.

I feel like thats the route we take in most matters, often in relation to actives with much higher mortality rates.

Very confused by the entire thing.

vetted dosage recommendations on the bottle?

The article tends to already align with my thinking so excuse my digression:

What is the actual reasoning behind reaching 15 an hour that precludes landing on 20 or 25 an hour?

To me this seems like such a feelings (is-ought sorta deal) thing that I am convinced I'm missing the systemic arguments here.