the5avage

Is there a paper explaining it in more detail? I also saw on his website he has a similar algorithm for audio compression...

The examples unsolved by high compute o3 look a lot like the raven progressive matrix tests used in IQ tests.

When their smart young people leave to earn more money abroad, wouldn't it make sense to take smart young people from other countries that aren't that materialistic? Just asking for a friend...

Yes.

I was always fascinated by siberia. Pretty sad that visiting it will be off the table for many years now.

From my experience with a lot of hilarious SQL stuff I have seen in the wild.

It would be a good start to read the paper of codd and trying to understand what the relational model is. It's only 11 pages long and doing that would reduce the suffering in this world.

It depends on so many things, but in a climate where someones income depends on the performance it is easy to understand they behave defensive.

As a counter example I worked for a small company where the owner is a very good software engineer. I knew that he knew that I know what I'm doing.

So we could freely talk about problems without the toxicity that often comes with it.

It's quite old but german philosopher Schopenhauer wrote about it in "The art of being right"

He talks about dirty tricks to win an argument regardless of the content

You can easily see that behavior in politics

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Art_of_Being_Right

He didn't kill someone. He bailed out of a malfunctioning plane with little time to decide.

If his plane went towards the ground with mach 1 at 1900 feet impact would occur in 1.5 seconds.

He was at 1900 feet and could not be sure in which direction the plane was going.

If the plane would fly towards the ground with mach 1 it would have hit it in 1.5 seconds.

The investigation report said the F-35′s transponder failed as a result of the electrical malfunction

Reading the article before posting comments could help.

But it doesn't proof that it was possible for the pilot to know this.

When a modern aircaft like this has an electrical failure I would feel very uncomfortable.

He also lost part of his displays during conditions with little sight.

So imo the question should be if it would have been possible for him to check if the airplane is really out of control, in a way that it wouldn't cost his life if it was.

The investigation report said the F-35′s transponder failed as a result of the electrical malfunction

So there is serious electrical malfunction and the pilot loses communication and also some of his displays multiple times.

In hindsight we know it wasn't that serious and the plane could have kept flying.

But how can the pilot figure that out, while flying the aircraft? One needs to evaluate decisions based on the information available at the time the decision was made.

What is also great about C# is that the language server for editor support uses the real compiler. I once set that up with emacs and it is by far the best experience I had in emacs with any language.

I once had a professor who worked on magnetic fluids. They can (potentially) be used to transport the medication of chemo therapy directly to the tumor, without destroying the rest of the body.

Problem is it is basically impossible for research (without the money of big pharma) to ever try this - even though he works at a very big and respected University.

It is not even possible to try this with people who will literally die to cancer anyway and who would want to try the treatment.

Ok, but since we don't understand everything about DNA, that can have unwanted side effects.

Are you making fun of me or do you really not understand that?

Oh, maybe I missed that we already completely understand how DNA works.

Changing code you don't understand can have effects you did not intend.

Who would have expected that?

The idea that phones should reboot periodically after an extended period with no network is absolutely brilliant

If this is brilliant I'm Einstein

I think you have a very special definition of reasoning only you can understand.

I really hope you sort this out.

When I have my masters degree finished I would like to live in your beautiful country where a lot of wonderful people live.

You dont even have sidewalks to go by foot. You are in general cultural distain towards anything that is not a big 4WD car.

Thats too simple.

The problem is that a lot of democracies have a demography skewed towards old people and at the same time a simple majority can dictate over s.th. like a minority of 30% of the voters.

Because not everyone has a computer science degree.

They probably want to allow their kids to use a computer, so it would be very easy for the kid to go to instagram when they dont look.

worst of dystopia in the 80's

Huxley's "Brave New World" was published 1932

As a german imo the real problem is that we replaced reasoning with ideology.

There are sometimes complex connections between cause and effect. It is not enough to just have the right intention.

It is really f up but there are so many worse things that I just dont have the energy to feel angry about this one.

Yes but when the result is always skewed to one side then - even if the result is within the margin - the predicted mean is wrong.

Otherwise the real result would be distributed around the mean within the margin of error.

There is some bias and the polls did not correctly factor that into their statistical model.

This is the most likely explaination imo. But even then it should be possible to use bayes rule to price it into the result.