HN user

tdignan

3 karma
Posts0
Comments17
View on HN
No posts found.

OP should set up an AI chatbot to triage his customer support. It probably wouldn't be that hard to send that code right back to GPT and get a fix suggestion to the customer instantly. Stick your documentation for each endpoint in a vector database, and use RAG to give them a quick fix. If it doesn't work let them go to level 2 support for a fee.

Of course the same 3/10 Americans will not flinch when they buy Chinese manufactured iPods and other gadgets. Since, China doesn't own the brand. It's clearly not about nationalism, but about a general distaste for China. The same Americans will probably snag a BMW or a Mercedes without a second thought.

For those of you defending Chinese made goods, that's understandable. I don't think anyone should take a nationalist viewpoint on these issues.

However, you should note that political prisoners in China's Laogai are often manufacturing some of the Chinese goods you consume, which are not labeled as such, and made in violation of Chinese law. A quick google turns up this: http://laogai.org/system/files/pdf/inland_web.pdf More googling will inevitably turn up that products such as sesame street (tm) slippers, toilet paper, and other big box store staples are made this way. See also: http://laogai.org/blog/laogai-museum-window-china%E2%80%99s-...

Though the term "Laogai" is dated and China stopped referring to them that way in the 90s, a documentary by Al-Jazeera English (Which got the news network EXPELLED from China) makes me think a lot different:

http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/slaverya21stcenturyevil/...

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia-pacific/2012/05/201257195...

One major caveat: word of mouth will lose the extension in translation. People still assume .com first if they can't think of anything else. Scale up, and that's a sizable portion of lost users.

I once got $500 through network solutions for a domain I didn't even want. A year later the buyer let it expire.

The way network solutions even found me? WHOIS.. Did you try whois yet? Their contact might be right there.. they might go lower.

In cases where something is fundamentally broken but something "needs" to be changed now, I do this.

i.e:

// This is how it should be // foo(...) // But, since the code is horribly broken, we'll have to do: bar()

>a) delete the code. It'll be in version control anyway right? You do do version control right?

If only digging code up from a previous version was as easy as uncommenting it.

It's a shame that we give attention whoring journalists like this guy any attention at all. More sensational bs. If I wanted sensationalist, I'd be on reddit's /r/politics.

It must be nice to be so established as Zed Shaw such that all it takes to get to the top of HN is a couple C exercises. It's almost like if a mathematician could get publicity for talking about addition and subtraction.

With that said, when I first saw Learn Python The Hard Way, it immediately reminded me of the time I spent reading K&R2. Its exercise rich style is what programming books are lacking these days. K&R2 taught me how to program.

Morally? Isn't privacy important to you? Leaving the moral judgement up to what the intruder does with the data he finds seems a bit delayed to me. He is immoral from the get-go, by trespassing in the personal property of others. It does not matter if I forget to lock my door. People often do. It does not make it OK to open my door.

You probably have this opinion because you think it's the cool way to think, that these 'hackers' have a great function in society, but lets shift the analogy: do you think your government should be able to do the same? If there was a story about the US government doing this stuff, HN would go insane with tirades about how the government is out to get us.

But no, not if it's lulzsec, not if it's some cracker kid. It's the romantic fantasy of the teenage computer hacker, rebelling against the world and saving the day... I mean posting your nudes on facebook. Everyone here emphasizes with it so much that they're blind to the reality that it's just wrong to invade the privacy of others, under any circumstance.

The only exception I could think of would be to invade the privacy of an oppressive government.