HN user

tardy_one

36 karma
Posts0
Comments44
View on HN
No posts found.

For server CPUs there's not a similar problem or they realize server purchasers may be less willing to tolerate it? I'm not all that thrilled with the prospect of buying Intels especially when wondering about waiting to 5 year out replacement compared to a few generations ago, but AMD server choices can be a bit limited and I'm not really sure how to evaluate if there may be increasing surprises more across the board.

It was really a bit fortunate that the employee pilot quit.. As much of a mess as it was, it was a fair trolley problem trade, and if the owner/engineer who ignored expert opinion was not among the victims there would have been a lot more social friction over the matter of manslaughter, surviving to reframe a misfortune, etc.

Requiring crowdstrike or similar to be able to do business isn't a requirement from government, it is from exactly this industry consensus where business, insurance, etc, gets consulting advice on what best practices exist and should be required.

We have to do precisely what we've done because it isn't working?

Ah yes, signalling on what we would have done.. Well, I'd totally have delivered panels if Convolt and Chinese companies were banned a few years ago. Make the market exclusive to me and I'll look into what the profit will be if I start producing them. I'll also be sure to prevent the domestic installer industry from taking advantage of low prices, only a small number of authorized ones will pay enough kick backs to have any availability. But its not all economic loss, the repair industry will need to be a lot better with my exclusive US panels.

I don't see the point. Your work is going fine, so why not look for a hobby that you enjoy instead of making a burden out of finding a work related hobby? There are plenty of non coding things to do and their differences from your day job may bring new ideas and perspective.

From what I've heard, most of those sites side automatically with the customer giving you rights similar to a merchant in a credit card transaction, or really a bit less since that might be all the leverage they actually have and they don't really want to spend their income trying to arbitrate and lose customers who may pay next time.

You are confusing the vast major of people with the small number of people who usually have worse options and make bad decisions and turn avoiding a slight loss into jail time for doing what someone like Trump says.

I'm not saying Musk won't find those people, I'm saying he has reduced the rest of his life to being surrounded by those people. A giant drop from what he was attracting when he began his startups.

If the rest of the US takes a realist view like yours then it is best not to waste time there and start to consider which economies accept US resources/credentials and will do better.. IMO, that's exactly what a successful Russian did in the 90s and why they aren't foolishly still in Russia submitting and becoming fodder.

Yeah.. Everyone should expect every publically traded corporation to end up controlled by someone in the same mental decline as McAfee and never make a long term contract they don't expect to spend millions enforcing internationally.

Ruining such people's future prospects whenever this happens to reduce the future risk has been such a good strategy that countries like the US introduced credit rating bureaus to emulate this for managing risk with less famous people.

We are naturally in a very unusual time, but things will shift back and the facts will stay and reputational meaning will be interpreted correctly then.

There are always enough idiots to do business with if you are a famous connman, but your business is always of a certain limited category.

If he were poor and did this I think you'd admit he is a putz. I live in a free country where I can choose which market participants to deal with and see no reason to feel intimidated by the buying power of a putz I won't ever be foolish enough to depend on. The more significant someone is in the society the more likely they are to be able to afford my position and not risk yours.

That's a Musk summary of his distorted reality. What happened in their international real estate is that they vacated key real estate where they had leases. They've pissed off the people that will do their long term leases on prime showrooms to BYD, not just the desperate highway belt office park admins.

Even if people in that part of the real estate market are desperate relative to their normal they have tricks to ignore business they don't want to deal with and take a lower offer from someone they either trust or at least don't distrust.

Making it obvious that the US is no longer a country of laws and contract law will work against people like him in the long run, so his take for a lot of future costs is irrational and I think he should finally deal with his mental problems.

> but in the longer term I think it would hurt possibilities

Doesn't matter in this weeks market, but he can't even convince people he's capable of remaining a passive investor, so ten years from now no top spots, no top people because the way norms are enforced is by black balling people like him whenever it is tolerably inconvenient.

I don't really get his behavior on this one.. $500m is a lot to save, but this is someone who has lost billions more on various other things..

In some particular markets it may be helpful to only attract workers who aren't very confident, but in the longer term I think it would hurt possibilities to have a lot of the work force take a piss on your job offers. I.e. never the best in a niche, only whoever will entertain an offer connected to Musk.

I think anyone who can find the right window and fix an install using just the UI has put a lot more work in than someone who could copy complete working answers from stack overflow and now GPT. Of course they have to train at it over and over since they can't use shell history so they no longer think it is a real skill to find these absurd boxes.

I'm not really that convinced that it isn't mostly social.. There were more intolerant than diagnosed until the 90s and that has now just flipped with the social overcompensation.

It's really very easy to buy in to the dominant social narrative as an explanation for one of the many undiagnosable health incidents we experience in a lifetime, and the placebo effect confirms whatever is socially helpful.

Most of these social changes now originate or become big from the US first because it dominates international media.

Software Engineering and Machine Learning are both very fad driven and you should not emphasize any field where most of the material is 10 years old or less. No one is going to care if you can SAFe agile next decade or understand currentgenerative text models.

Focus on classic Computer Science, I.e. Chomsky has a generative text model you should know. For better SWE, business and MBA are real, and Math/statistics/are real fields for Math modeling where someone who studied them 20 years ago still has a basis today.