ta43434

    But if all the splinter third party candidates got their
    act together and mobilized themselves and developed a
    solid platform, they could certainly make a run
    themselves.

http://people.howstuffworks.com/debate4.htm

That defeats the purpose of patents for drugs.

It's convenient for drugs that have already been discovered and validated, but the difficult part of making a drug is not the chemical process to produce it, but knowing which chemical to produce in the first place. Knowing where to tap with the hammer, if you will.

If you want there to be no patents for drugs, that's an argument to make, but this type of "patent" is just a fig leaf for not having patents at all.

From your link:

    The subjects—*none of whom regularly ate or drank caffeinated products*—

    ...almost as much of an embarrassment as...

I like the analogy, but I think SUVs were really a way to exploit a loophole in emissions regulations. Because of the technical definitions, SUVs count as trucks not cars for emissions standards.

    the records were burned because they were full of mold, a health hazard

Surely historians, librarians and archaeologists have faced mold before and have methods to deal with it.

The (world famous) pianist Krystian Zimerman also had his concert grand destroyed by customs while on tour:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krystian_Zimerman#Criticism_of_...