HN user

swift532

155 karma

Software engineer

Posts0
Comments111
View on HN
No posts found.

I've found ChatGPT 4o (the voice one) to be useful, I just need to prompt it first by saying `Whatever you hear in Chinese, say in English, whatever you hear in English, say in Chinese`. It refuses to cooperate if you tell it to be a live translator.

Anyways, it seems to understand context really well, I tried it out with a Chinese person and they said it worked really well.

It even works for Croatian which is awesome as it is a really small language that anything voice-related usually does not work with.

I closed your website instantly as soon as it played a sound, it's pretty bad it does that. When I try to click on the whitepaper button, the click actually goes to the globe. I am sorry but it's very amateurish.

Anyways, what do you offer that bitcoin doesn't and what do you don't offer that bitcoin does?

If sufficiently motivated, take pics with your phone. With a good camera, you could minify a lot of code into a tiny font size, take a photo or multiple photos, and OCR them later.

Or encrypt the whole repo and just send it to a bucket somewhere. I mean there's got to be a lot of ways to do it if you really want to.

I am not the best person to address everything point by point as I am not putting enough thought into it, but perhaps I could point (heh) you in the right direction.

Sure you could let Visa do this (as they and Mastercard handle most online payments now anyways), and it would probably work as well as Visa/Mastercard work now, but for some people that is not good enough.

1. Differentiate clearing (telling you you now have some money) and settlement (you getting the money you "have"). For Visa and Mastercard the latter takes days or more.

2. Permissionless means that you don't need any entity's permission to transact. Visa and Mastercard definitely require permission, and on occassion don't give it for various legal but "immoral" things like porn, Wikileaks, and who knows what in the future.

3. Borderless is kind of similar to permissionless. As soon as you bring in legacy behemoths like Visa into it, this kind of goes away.

4. With decentralization, fees are determined objectively (you pay to get in, and if there is enough demand, regardless of price, blocks are full). A monopolist would charge as much as they could get away with, sometimes even if that means no transactions are being performed.

---

I would say that with a Visa(like) company, you definitely lose 2, and 4 will probably have some bullshit involved.

It can get a bit impossible. I recently wanted to watch Don't Look Up with Croatian audio (am Croatian, I know it's stupid but I thought it would be funny) and Chinese subtitles (because that's my GF's first language), but it is not possible. If I am on my Croatian profile I can use Croatian audio but not Chinese subtitles. If she is on her profile she can use Chinese subtitles but not Croatian audio.

I get that it's a UX thing because most people aren't interested in Swahili subtitles, but it would be nice to have an option to expand the list since I know they have the data.

Sorry if I assume too much, but I think you'd be thinking quite differently if you had to consider buying your first home on the French riviera now, on something like a 60.000-100.000 euro pre-tax salary.

I would disagree in the case of platforms which are monopolies. Or in this case let's call it a triopoly because they collaborate on things like this.

Same like how public utility companies cannot shut off your power or water because they don't like you.

It'll make things harder but I'm not sure how much.

However, as far as I know there isn't such a great number of displaced. I don't have exact numbers but mostly only pre-WWII buildings were damaged, while most people live in skyscrapers outside the city center.

To be frank, those hypothetical answers seem very hostile and I wouldn't want to work in an environment where communication works this way.

Instead of saying "of course there would be" there could be a bit of a deeper discussion and the two people could figure out the best solution together. It's always supposed to be people against a problem, not people against people.

You achieve the first by having a distributed, decentralized, fully censorship resistant base layer in which the rule set is more or less like the current Bitcoin rule set.

You achieve the second by building upon this base layer. Just like how in the real world the base layer is physical transfer of cash and assets (not very reversible), and we have a financial and legal system built upon that (to simplify, it's doubtful how relevant physical transfer is any more).

I find it very infuriating in general when someone uses a cute or smiley emoji after telling me something negative. I'm sure that mostly I'm paranoid and irrationally irate about that, but I can't help thinking that people are rubbing it in my face when they do that. Am I the problem?