HN user

swiecki

54 karma
Posts0
Comments35
View on HN
No posts found.

This could really use a lot of editing. Far too much of it is whining about slow internet that doesn't reach a meaningful conclusion, but instead generalizes from his anecdote.

If anyone is reading comments before reading the article, I recommend scanning it quickly. You won't miss anything.

This will be so useful in all my new projects! I'm using this and that other one character javascript framework I remember seeing. Anyone have a link?

It seems like it's really getting killed under the load. This also isn't the first node project demo I've seen deployed that gets destroyed by a bunch of people visiting it to check it out. Anyone have some tips for deploying Node in a manner that your server won't just get destroyed? What's the point of supporting 1000's of users in say, socket.io if most people's deployment schemes allow for a max of say, 250 concurrent connections?

Any tips or explanations would be most welcome.

Codename: Obtvse 14 years ago

>> Execution of course matters but there is also value in being first and taking the right marketing approach.

I absolutely agree with you. I think for a lot of people, including myself, however, the best marketing approach would have been to say "check this out, I did something cool, and I've open sourced it." This is what dcurtis probably should have done. He didn't do any groundbreaking rails code, and there was very little value in having a new workflow of blogging exist only on his servers. I think the value of Nate open sourcing it is much higher than if he had just built a clone and kept it to himself.

Basically, the community response supporting Nate is strong because he did something that benefits the community as a whole, where as dcurtis did something that benefited only himself and then shouted about it.

That's my (pretty myopic and polemic) take on all this.

>> EDIT: Oh, look. I have the attention of the majority of HN. Allow me to now exploit you:

Your edit is the best thing to come out of this entire ordeal. Thanks for not abusing your newfound fame :)

I totally agree with this. I thought it was a joke. I didn't think frat guys were actually learning to code and calling themselves programmers or something...

The point of this blog post is basically that it doesn't matter if you program or what, if you're a douche, you are a douche.

Pg 43- "[REDACTED] commented that, although he does not consider Mr. Jobs to be a friend at this time, he considers Mr. Jobs to be a successful individual because he can delegate tasks to individuals."

I wonder who that woz?

Why 13th Chords 15 years ago

Very much baby steps in jazz music theory, but this will probably be helpful to some people!

[dead] 15 years ago

I would rather do what this guy did then spend 40 years of my life trying to get people to click ads.

It sounds like he didn't enjoy his job on wall street. I wouldn't enjoy a job as a facebook developer. We all have our opinions.

Occupy Wall St. arguably didn't do much to affect Washington, or the regulations that affect the firms that protesters were blaming.

I'm not experienced in these matters, but it seems to me like a wiser alternative would be to found some kind of Tech Lobby that advocates for policies that benefit the internet in Congress and educates members of Congress about the internet.

In my opinion, the quality of content on HN has plummeted since SOPA became an internet issue.

It is reminiscent of how the Digg community stopped caring about interesting stories and instead became wrapped up in its own cycles of bullshit, RIAA, Blu-Ray, iPhone, etc.

I guess these just don't match my personal definition of a software bug... I was expecting an unexpected result as a product of good programming. This is just "5 reasons this line of javascript shouldn't have been written" and seems to be more about UNIX permissions than code.

They did it to protect jobs. Sun claimed to have to cut 3000 jobs because of the EU approval delay. The US probably was trying to rush them so the merger could go through and Sun would not go bankrupt.

It's all in the cable. Read it for yourself, and then decide if this government intervention was a good or bad thing.

Note: Above, I have not given my opinion on this. I have not said, "this is good." I have only given my speculation as to the reasons the US gov would do this based on the cable.

I just wanted to point out the obvious to any potential readers: this is just one indicator and does not reflect what is happening in all sectors of the economy. Rather, it a price chart of commercial shipping services. Useful, but definitely not the end-all be-all economic recession indicator that the author makes it out to be.