subru

Please kindly remove these comments.

Can a moderator please kindly delete this comment and the child

They are distant enough that it's not confusing.

I disagree. With a high sex drive, it's probable that I would reproduce eventually, risking passing on my genes. Suicide ensures that procreation won't occur.

This isn't occurring st some subset of stages; it's been steady throughout my entire life. And I've grown more and more cynical with age. It's a decision that I've long intellectualized.

People who don't survive aren't around anymore to discuss whether they are satisfied with their decision. Why would I waste my time talking to someone who intends to talk me out of something that isn't a debate to me? It's a personal decision.

This reminds me of my core mission: sterilize myself or self terminate.

Everything I've experienced and felt since youth indicates that my seed is unwanted by humanity, and it's clear suicide helps evolution by eliminating bad genes. I think about suicide constantly and have done so since youth. This is my brain telling me to help humanity by leaving. Hoping to complete that mission ASAP.

In a situation like this it's safer to say that your profile is safe only if that specific identity is on a white list of known safe identities. Thus things like test will by default, Show as unsafe which is better because it hides information about who is unsafe. If designed right, random form data will simply return unsafe silently. Maybe you could try testing for that.

Paying out anonymous folks that demand ransom of copyable data is futile. There won't be incentive to not leverage the data even if the ransom were to be paid.

The reality is that BTC helps to facilitate various criminal behavior, some of which would not exist otherwise.

If 4100 were to break today, there would be greatly increased probability of accelerated downside. This is deserved since BTC is leveraged by criminals such as in this case. Don't be surprised if this ends up becoming the case as a form of public penalization of such criminal behavior.

This should be downvoted, because one can trivially disagree with your premise, without being misinformed nor with any conflict of interest.

Why be long here? Are you holding out for a break above 5k that may never come? HN, please listen to me, it's at 4500 and all you have to do is sell.

No, another cryptocurrency (the word crypto is already used to mean something else) can gain steam while the price of BTC goes sideways or down, and eventually win. Just saying the statement "no matter what happens" is false.

Wouldn't it be better to ask if his position is any different, now that he has had time to research the topic? It would be helpful if you could provide material info to Mr. Schiller that he does not have, beyond the ICO revelation, so he can re-assess. You clearly have important info that he could use.

Stay long at your own risk, imo. Selling rallies has been the regime for almost a week now.

Could be worth a gamble here to short BTC up to 4500 with a tight stop, good r:r. Be wrong quickly if wrong.

The current environment looks good for trading.

Someone eventually is going to build an app framework that offers clean reusable abstractions for micro services in the context of a further-abstracted orchestrated and containerized provider-agnostic automatically highly available and scalable infrastructure, complete with backup, security, log analysis, and all open source and installable through a single remotely executable shell script.

No, it's not reasonable. It's a vote, not justification to throw fists or anything in between, even.

Please don't. It's irrelevant.

The short 5k-5.5k idea could be a bust anyway; maybe we do rally to 6k from here. I am concerned with managing risk, less so with any particular idea itself. That's why I thought it was funny that another posted how I was "very wrong" about how I described volatility. Who cares who is right or wrong? It doesn't matter. Just be safe, that's all that matters. Protect capital.

Look pal idk what your cost basis or portfolio allocation is in BTC but please just be safe, friend.

Years ago deleted it

Sorry meant nothing has risen from a fraction of a penny to five grand in human history, iow referring to the percentage moves that we may never see again in our lifetimes. I stand corrected. Meant relative to any other investment in history.

Sorry bro on my phone didn't proofread. I have since edited the post and added the missing –.

BTC has never-before seen volatility, biggest bubble of all time. If bagholders are all aboard, prepare for a dip below 2k for a swing. The market is very orderly (which is why I was able to predict both the price and time of peak, see my other account) using tech analysis only. Therefore there is sufficient evidence of a balanced disparity between insiders (brought to you by GS and company) and the uninformed.

For there to be a move above 5500 you'll need a new wave of buying pressure. This puppy is now owned by your rent seeking masters. It's up to the big players to govern how price is to move and that's largely a function of how much buying interest really remains.

It doesn't take much to realize BTC itself has dubious value; better tech will emerge in our generation. This was merely a first step. That has nothing to do with the short term price or where it finally tops if it hasn't already, though.

Goldman came out on public radio to state the price will be a buy below 2k. Wise to heed their advice here. Trick is to know which of their info they release is reliable, which requires a system in and of itself.

I think it's about time I go public with my experiences in USA society.

2014 was ugly; yahoo finance news articles used for malicious harassment... not unlike the forces that corrupt this very website. Sorry HN, you too have been infiltrated by malicious forces, the difference of course is that user content creates a deniably divider (just like Reddit or other similarly designed sites).

If bounce try sell around 4400-4500. Keep in mind the main idea is still to sell up to 5500, stop loss above

Bag holders will get smoked. The higher it went the more uninformed got on board, many of which were invariably using leverage indirectly or otherwise.

Far cry from erlang dude telling me to mine BTC when it was still under a buck. Something about a whistleblower who got away...

This game has been around for a long time. Once Goldman and others got involved in earnest it was over. At least they've advised market makers and the public that the buy range is below 2000. That's why I said it on my other account; my chart analysis cooborates that support is way the fuck down there.

I'm still incorporating outside info in some form as it becomes applicable. and it's applicable here..

Manage risk.

At least you're not using leverage Nico.

If I self terminate I'll attempt to report back to you. Look for 666 symbolism and a pack of fruit cups offered to you as a place to hide tens of thousands of fiat currency. If you see that you know I'm in hell and reincarnation didn't apply at least to me.

Old school leet speak used lowercases for vowels

Oh you humans. Genetic engineering, coupled with advances in digital/consciousness interfaces will yield spontaneously appearing brains with an API.

Good luck.