This is like a pea buried under 7 mattresses of delusion. If you dont like Musk, fine, but cmon man.
HN user
splitstud
This right here. This is the problem. Faulty logic like this is why we are stuck with underperforming schools.
No, no, no. If you want better schools then vote for school choice.
This weird drive to compel the speech of others is the thing that needs to be discredited.
2 days later 1000 people would be subscribed to r/C&Dfarming
They're literally equal as classes for this subject matter.
Well, you could for comparison's sake look back from now to when these same warnings were issued 5, 10 or 20 years ago
What could possibly be more hypocritical than your attempt at a rights-based argument while reserving rights to only some living beings? The lack of self-awareness is breathtaking.
The warnings started how long ago? The compatability mode is available and works.
Adding value propositions:
Find a cheaper way to do something Find a better way to market something
He wasn't wrong. End of the day, these kind of 'businesses' are merely exploiting a market inefficiency that won't last forever.
The fuss? Discrimination is not ok.
Hence the name Skimmington
Say you received 1,000 when graduating high school. You then got a job making 100/month, signed a lease and moved out of the house. You have expenses of 180/month. How long before you are destitute?
I suppose one man's regulatory capture is balanced by another man's monopolistic behemoth pushing out a competitor that doesn't have an alternate revenue stream.
This is the beauty of Eve. Suck rocks for ore while watching movies. Solo/team hunting pvp. Venture capitalist. Space Trucker. Honest Questor or other PVE solo/team player. Absolute troll who creates a roleplay justification to being the worst of bastards to newbies (but just inside the rules). So many playstyles.
I liked the stealth game as well. Work your way in a stealthy ship deep into Nullsec and do your thing - whether that thing is a bunny rabbit of a frigate designed to find and steal cookies and outwit the fox, or a stealth bomber that hides near the cookie jar to squash the unsuspecting. And both of these have to find a way to get back to civilization with the lootz.
Controlling thought by controlling speech is nothing new, and it IS a historically ignored problem
I have hired several WGU grads, and will again. You made a good choice.
I let it grow as interior fencing. It provides a nice environment for wild dewberries as well. And, of course, it is a never-ending fight to keep it from taking over the entire ranch. Love/hate.
It only matters if Apple doesn't care how many people develop for their platform. You say 'People will do whatever...'. Sure, some will. Some won't. Some have to. Would you want your platform to be skewed in any way towards those that 'have to'?
The libertarian and bog standard answers agree in this case = you don't need to know how, we don't need you to be the decision maker.
It's actually surprising how good it is
Why would I ever import from a supplier whose only positive is price, if I have to go to extra effort and expense - making them no longer competitive in any respect?
Supply chains are already moving from China as fast as possible. Access to western markets will disappear. No amount of rhetoric will change this.
Everything you just said is meaningless evasion. Glow more.
Also a good lesson for students: avoid trouble when it is easy to do so.
No its literally about avoiding the morass of legal compliance as best you can, whenever and wherever.
These are good points, but this isn't a case of discrimination.
What is it about Purdue that makes them unlikely to take this seriously?
Two giant paragraphs that are largely irrelevant as well as inaccurate. Purdue has a framework to work with to adjudicate situations regarding the student experience. We will see how it plays out. Your emotional response to some trigger doesn't have anything to do with what is being discussed.
No. Someone needs to come up with a compelling reason to change our practices first.
Which is silly without evidence I agree. So, with no experience what value does she have? There's nothing in her academic work that shows some outstanding quality. Is she in ideologue? If so, of what type?
Maybe that's it, thanks
What no one seems to be asking is why was she nominated in the first place? The list of more qualified candidates numbers in the thousands.