HN user

spindle

759 karma
Posts0
Comments438
View on HN
No posts found.

Not enough of them do, I agree, but some of the Modern Monetary Theory people do. E.g. Mark Blyth (some very entertaining talks on youtube), Stephanie Kelton. Also political economists do and always have, I believe. (IANAE, and in fact I'm not certain that Mark Blyth is an MMT person, but I thought I'd get the ball rolling.)

I've tried it with fish and found that, for me, it didn't add much and wasn't worth the switch, but it is arguably slightly better than fish's built-in history; so I'd say only bother if you particularly love learning new things of this type.

places won't hire you as a professor unless you have at least a Master's -- relevant work experience be damned

I believe this is largely to make sure that professors have plenty of experience of what it's like to be professored AT, at the relevant level. I've actually changed my own mind about whether that's a good argument or not (you can have fun guessing in which direction I've changed my mind), but anyway, having been a professor myself I'm pretty sure that's what they're thinking.

Can you say more about what's wrong about it? It seems plain right to me, in Newtonian physics, assuming only that light has a speed (which was not at all a crazy thing to think at that point), and historians of cosmology usually agree (source personal communication, so I could be wrong).