HN user

skeletoncrew2

10 karma
Posts0
Comments10
View on HN
No posts found.

Yes this is the most glaring issue. There also two disconnects later in the article: at the end it laments how china has been increasing transformer manufacturing but the US government has done nothing. Then in the next sentence its mentions trumps tariffs have increased transformer costs, I. E. Government action to increase domestic production. It also glosses over the new DOE rule on how transformers are made…so maybe there is a larger story there relevant to the lack of supply.

I think one of the reasons OOP gets a bad reputation is simply that the naming conventions are unintuitive. For example it is sort of unclear what inheritance actually means in practice. In the context of this essay, why does inheritance only apply to allocating objects, but not to methods? In other words, maybe the point of inheritance is to facilitate a more general method, that is capable of operating on the common subset of two different types of objects?

I’d posit that AI is good at tasks that managers have to do: it is a world composited primarily of processes and procedures set up by humans, about other humans. In other words it is just like an ai trained on text. At the worker level you have to interact with the real, outside world in some way. If I could have AI take the wheel for every share point tracker management manages to cook up, I’d be raving about it too.

Haha this article doesn’t seem to know much about money: in paragraph 1 it notes that Roman gold coins in India could be melted and reformed into other gold valuables, then in paragraph 2 it asserts that this suggests Rome ran a trade deficit.

It later claims that currency may have caused a plague…hello maybe it was trading that caused the bacteria to move