Like how the government operated during covid.
HN user
simianparrot
No they are not
Social credit bonus for wild unfounded claims online is probably nice if you live in the top 5 megacities.
That’s not the topic. Read the post I replied to. No matter what a piece of software will never be a human.
AI psychosis would be my term. When you attribute to software the characteristics of a human you are in a psychosis.
This is a good thing, then we can trace exactly who paid for it, and fine them.
There is no other reason to have uranium enriched to that level. None.
The subtle but consistent downvoting to a score of 0 to -1 feels very botted. No matter how I write the comments, anything counter the "AI" propaganda nets me a 0 or -1 total score. I don't care about the points whatsoever, but I find it interesting how there's never a massive downvote, just enough to keep such comments at 0 to -1.
May be reading into things too much, but it is a bit odd.
Because HN is YCombinator which has invested in probably hundreds of «AI» firms by now. Including OpenAI.
Allowing slop articles like this literally prints them evaluation money.
In science, one hallucinated reference can corrupt the entire rest of the work. So you're completely wrong.
Yeah but they don’t erect statues like this group does
Morals are relative. I happen to align with Japan's morals, and wish Norway would take inspiration from it. We're on the far opposite end of the spectrum.
The punishment should be harsher than the crime. Stealing an apple might not be a "big problem", but it sets a precedent that taking someone else's property is acceptable under some circumstances -- say, the relative value of said object.
China would be a good guess.
«Uncivilised»
Compared to what? European and other western countries with significantly higher crime rates?
Safety comes at a cost.
Nobody needs to pay for any of that
Apple can't control non-Apple devices. They can only control their own. So this makes perfect sense.
Now colour the flag rainbow colored. Or maybe black, white, green, and red. Or maybe white and red.
Whose flag is blinding whom?
... they don't require code review by at least one other person before merging..?
If this is indicative of practices over at MS these days, it explains a lot.
Just give them more money, surely it'll get better.
/s
It's increased in lockstep here on HN as well. It used to be that I came here for the comments, but more and more the comments are going the way of everywhere else: Inflammatory, polarising, and more and more botted (both automated and human bots) -- no proof, but I've been around the internet since the early 90's, I see the patterns.
I even get sucked into contributing at times, which is why that descent into trash _works_ so well. I hate it, and I visit HN less and less as a result.
Poe's law gets me again. It's getting really rough these days on HN, I have to admit... My bad. Seems the AI-Protectorate Flagging Brigade managed to parse the sarcasm though.
If it can't even point you to a real product on an existing website, why do you trust it for any other information..?
A single byte change in the input changes the output. The sentence "Please do this for me" and "Please, do this for me" can lead to completely distinct output.
Given this, you can't treat it as deterministic even with temp 0 and fixed seed and no memory.
Societies drive people to suicide in general. Families also do. I don't think the solution is to make the world a padded room.
We're struggling with the pollution levels from road dust now though. It's worse in most cities than it ever was with combustion engines. Yes there's lower Co2, but the dust and tire particles are actually more dangerous.
What about the increased pollution from road dust? In Norway this has led to higher pollution levels that are directly dangerous to people and animals than back when we were all combustion vehicles.
The heavier EV's are causing genuinely harmful particles simply by driving on the roads themselves.
We do and many of us prefer it that way. I’m not on any major social media because I personally consider it asocial — you can’t have that many actual friends or acquaintances. My «social media» is a handful of smaller discord servers and an irc channel, and an extensive webring of personal websites.
Maybe it's ok to create something that isn't for most people. That's how the internet started out. It's only gotten worse the more accessible it became to most people. Maybe it's a good thing to create a split based on capabilities and technical know-how.
This and a lot of similar HN comments, often by fresh accounts, just read like viral marketing. Not least because of the capitalisation.
Claude Code sure is great. Claud Code and my Codex reignited my passion for programming. Codex and Claude.
Ugh.