Traditional virtualization still requires you to pay for your own power, cooling, redundancy, SAN, backup, network, etc.
Not every company has the need to staff all of these specialists.
HN user
Traditional virtualization still requires you to pay for your own power, cooling, redundancy, SAN, backup, network, etc.
Not every company has the need to staff all of these specialists.
It appears your organization left an elasticsearch database exposed to the internet. This happens frequently due to poor configuration.
You're either going to have logs pointing to an IP that the individual used to siphon your data, or nothing.
With an exposed elasticsearch database, you possibly had the data being siphoned by many parties, and are only aware now because of this particular incident.
If you have any operations regarding customers in Europe, you need to notify your relevant Data Protection Authority
https://edpb.europa.eu/about-edpb/board/members_en
You should also sign your engineers up for this course:
https://www.elastic.co/training/specializations/elastic-stac...
Hetzner is great until you have some sort of issue.
They seem to either not have much in the way of internal procedures or just ignore them if they exist.
As long as you're prepared for all of your data and backups to just disappear, it's a great low-cost environment.
If you expect their operational team to not accidentally delete your environment, it just hasn't happened to you yet.
The person you are responding to is suggesting a scenario like the movie 'contagion' where people marked clean are given a wristband or pass of some kind.
In reality testing can be used as an effective tool regardless of whether or not people can be 'certified'
The OP never said their example wasn't an outlier, they were just making a point that these things happen.
Regardless, you can't just respond to a specific example with broad generalizations. It's textbook 'whataboutism'.
NY subway averages almost 2 billion riders annually.
SF averages 50 million.
If SF had a subway system that handled 40x the amount of people you could start to draw some comparisons.
42% of respondents of an app.
Looking at their app, I'm surprised their audience didnt score higher.
I think the math problem could help, but you also need to ask yourself if you're just going to keep bypassing it anyway.. in which case software is unlikely to help much.
For you I would recommend the book: The Willpower Instinct by Kelly McGonigal. (audiobook is also well narrated)
It's well written and full of great methods for gaining your self control back.
Right, but I'm saying my setup is no different from the 'fraudsters' you describe, yet I have a seamless shopping experience online.
If I'm able to shop online without issues, why does everyone else 'need' an evercookie?
I'm sure it's helpful, it's the idea that it's necessary is what I take issue with.
It's a good story, and I'm sure similar mistakes happen, but this particular event is a work of fiction.
It's "silent" because people weren't getting diagnosed properly before.
Why would you check for pneumonia in a guy that comes in presenting stab wounds and reports no difficulty breathing?
Only now because with increased testing and experience are doctors realizing that many people have a pneumonia that doesn't present like pneumonia.
IBM tells CERT they don't care.
That's quite the "process error"
Why are 'evercookies' necessary.
My browser is setup to record no history or cookies.
It can be annoying to always have to dismiss the same popups you've dismissed before, but I've never had any issues with online payments or unnecessary captchas, including using stripe.
What am I missing?
This is their stated goal and intent for the platform.
It's also pretty obvious. These days Google ignores basic operators like quotation marks.
There is no evidence yet that immunity is even possible.
Until we know that, taking away healthcare workers, healthcare resources, and having volunteers willing to kill themselves is foolish, at best.
It's not just the US, the WHO is trying to tell people not to use masks unless they are sick or caring for someone that is.
It's irresponsibility on a massive scale.
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/30/world/coronavirus-who-mas...
Obviously frontline workers need priority for PPE, but there is zero reason this should stop anyone from making something homemade.
Quite possibly the dumbest thing I have ever read on this site.
Also worth noting is that in windows 10 you can add two additional clocks to the main one.
Very helpful when you are usually focused on just a few timezones in particular.
If you read the article it's about separating people.
The more office spaces you have, the more you can divide people into isolated groups.
I read your link after reading the source article and most of these were my thoughts as well.
Regardless of what the truth is, this study takes a lot of handwavy assumptions and presents them as fact.
It's totally unreasonable.
There isn't enough quinine in tonic water to benefit you and the alcohol is going to leach nutrients that your body needs, lower your white blood cell count, kill good flora in your mouth, lower your body's immune response, and leave you more susceptible to catching the virus.
You shouldn't present nonsense as fact, it doesn't help anyone, and in this case is actively dangerous.
You're only assuming that immunity is possible.
As the experts don't know this yet, it would be irresponsible of the general public to make this assumption.
(especially when the rate of mutation is taken into consideration)
He was probably trying to type emojis into form fields instead of punycode.
More datcenters / infrastructure I would imagine.
They seem to have some regions running at near capacity already.
All of this information is in the article.
I think you're confused. Banks aren't buying location information from carriers.
This has nothing to do with them being able to get your location from their app.
US/EU, and other laws all seem relevant.
What does this mean? In the US there is no law for this.
In the EU we have the GDPR which says you never get to own or control someone else's personal information without their permission.
Just because the info is leaked, that doesn't make it public domain. The data still belongs to the user, and the people that hold it should only ever be doing so with permission.
Everything you are saying about Native Americans is contradicted by every study that has been done so far.
https://www.wired.com/story/free-money-the-surprising-effect...
Yang also discusses this in his book.
Please don't comment hyperbole if you're not able to support your thoughts with data.
International waters have very little regulation.
Many places have rules and the ships switch to a cleaner fuel in these waters, but when they're on the open sea they have no incentive to not use bunker fuel.
Interesting concept, awful name.