HN user

semanticc

52 karma
Posts0
Comments30
View on HN
No posts found.

That's not an effect. As both in the case of a dividedend and a stock buy back, the company's market cap drops by the amount of cash that's being distributed out, creating an identical re-buying situation in market cap-weighted index funds. Stock price itself is irrelevant for index fund rebalances (unlike for shareholder returns).

So for my definition of “everywhere,” with the caveats mentioned above, the following features work everywhere. YMMV.

  .
  ^, $
  […], [^…]
  \*
  \w, \W, \s, \S
  \1 - \9 backreferences
  \b \B
  ? + 
  | alternation
  {n,m} for counting matches
  (...) capturing
Except that these don't work in macOS/BSD sed (even with -E flag):

- \w, \W, \s, \S - need to use POSIX classes instead: [[:alnum:]], [^[:alnum:]], [[:space:]], [^[:space:]]

- \b - need to use use [[:<:]] (word start) and [[:>:]] (word end) instead

- \B - (not a word start/end) no alternatives

It's not documented, but unfortunately neither of these re-signs the commits even if GPG signing is configured. They are based on `git replay`, and that doesn't sign either (at least yet).

Non-Zero-Sum Games 7 months ago

Do you have an example of this in mind where the known "tit for tat" strategy falls short?

You don't seem to get the point. That is only universal in current day English. In e.g. Finnish: miljoona = 1e6, miljardi = 1e9, biljoona = 1e12, triljoona = 1e18.

Why was the employees' common stock worth $0? Liquidation preference for the outside investors? Related: How can a regular employee joining a startup know beforehand that there isn't a high chance of their equity (which is probably a significant part of their total comp) being worthless even if a big acquisition is made?

Diamonds Suck 3 years ago

The [artificial] scarcity and [unjustifiably] high price are properties of almost all luxury goods. And those are exactly what makes them (watches, handbags, diamonds etc.) so desirable to many.

I fully agree that spending two months' gross salary on an engagement ring is way too much though, and I would never ever get into debt for that. But, similarly as I enjoy wearing a relatively useless but expensive watch daily, I didn't mind dropping approx. 2/3 of a month's net salary on my fiancé's diamond engagement ring, which she got to choose and now cherishes and admires every day.

The only problem with `apropos` is that it returns so many irrelevant results:

  $ apropos 'count lines' | wc -l
     167

  $ apropos 'count lines' | head
  AllPlanes(3), BlackPixel(3), WhitePixel(3), ConnectionNumber(3), DefaultColormap(3), DefaultDepth(3), XListDepths(3), DefaultGC(3), DefaultRootWindow(3), DefaultScreenOfDisplay(3), DefaultScreen(3), DefaultVisual(3), DisplayCells(3), DisplayPlanes(3), DisplayString(3), XMaxRequestSize(3), XExtendedMaxRequestSize(3), LastKnownRequestProcessed(3), NextRequest(3), ProtocolVersion(3), ProtocolRevision(3), QLength(3), RootWindow(3), ScreenCount(3), ScreenOfDisplay(3), ServerVendor(3), VendorRelease(3) - Display macros and functions
  EVP_PKEY_asn1_find(3ssl), EVP_PKEY_asn1_find_str(3ssl), EVP_PKEY_asn1_get_count(3ssl), EVP_PKEY_asn1_get0(3ssl), EVP_PKEY_asn1_get0_info(3ssl) - enumerate public key ASN.1 methods
  EVP_PKEY_meth_get_count(3ssl), EVP_PKEY_meth_get0(3ssl), EVP_PKEY_meth_get0_info(3ssl) - enumerate public key methods
  OCSP_REQUEST_new(3ssl), OCSP_REQUEST_free(3ssl), OCSP_request_add0_id(3ssl), OCSP_request_sign(3ssl), OCSP_request_add1_cert(3ssl), OCSP_request_onereq_count(3ssl), OCSP_request_onereq_get0(3ssl) - OCSP request functions
  OCSP_resp_find_status(3ssl), OCSP_resp_count(3ssl), OCSP_resp_get0(3ssl), OCSP_resp_find(3ssl), OCSP_single_get0_status(3ssl), OCSP_resp_get0_produced_at(3ssl), OCSP_resp_get0_signature(3ssl), OCSP_resp_get0_tbs_sigalg(3ssl), OCSP_resp_get0_respdata(3ssl), OCSP_resp_get0_certs(3ssl), OCSP_resp_get0_signer(3ssl), OCSP_resp_get0_id(3ssl), OCSP_resp_get1_id(3ssl), OCSP_check_validity(3ssl), OCSP_basic_verify(3ssl) - OCSP response utility functions
  OPENSSL_malloc_init(3ssl), OPENSSL_malloc(3ssl), OPENSSL_zalloc(3ssl), OPENSSL_realloc(3ssl), OPENSSL_free(3ssl), OPENSSL_clear_realloc(3ssl), OPENSSL_clear_free(3ssl), OPENSSL_cleanse(3ssl), CRYPTO_malloc(3ssl), CRYPTO_zalloc(3ssl), CRYPTO_realloc(3ssl), CRYPTO_free(3ssl), OPENSSL_strdup(3ssl), OPENSSL_strndup(3ssl), OPENSSL_memdup(3ssl), OPENSSL_strlcpy(3ssl), OPENSSL_strlcat(3ssl), CRYPTO_strdup(3ssl), CRYPTO_strndup(3ssl), OPENSSL_mem_debug_push(3ssl), OPENSSL_mem_debug_pop(3ssl), CRYPTO_mem_debug_push(3ssl), CRYPTO_mem_debug_pop(3ssl), CRYPTO_clear_realloc(3ssl), CRYPTO_clear_free(3ssl), CRYPTO_malloc_fn(3ssl), CRYPTO_realloc_fn(3ssl), CRYPTO_free_fn(3ssl), CRYPTO_get_mem_functions(3ssl), CRYPTO_set_mem_functions(3ssl), CRYPTO_get_alloc_counts(3ssl), CRYPTO_set_mem_debug(3ssl), CRYPTO_mem_ctrl(3ssl), CRYPTO_mem_leaks(3ssl), CRYPTO_mem_leaks_fp(3ssl), CRYPTO_mem_leaks_cb(3ssl), OPENSSL_MALLOC_FAILURES(3ssl), OPENSSL_MALLOC_FD(3ssl) - Memory allocation functions
  PKCS5_PBKDF2_HMAC(3ssl), PKCS5_PBKDF2_HMAC_SHA1(3ssl) - password based derivation routines with salt and iteration count
  RSA_set0_key(3ssl), RSA_set0_factors(3ssl), RSA_set0_crt_params(3ssl), RSA_get0_key(3ssl), RSA_get0_factors(3ssl), RSA_get0_crt_params(3ssl), RSA_get0_n(3ssl), RSA_get0_e(3ssl), RSA_get0_d(3ssl), RSA_get0_p(3ssl), RSA_get0_q(3ssl), RSA_get0_dmp1(3ssl), RSA_get0_dmq1(3ssl), RSA_get0_iqmp(3ssl), RSA_get0_pss_params(3ssl), RSA_clear_flags(3ssl), RSA_test_flags(3ssl), RSA_set_flags(3ssl), RSA_get0_engine(3ssl), RSA_get_multi_prime_extra_count(3ssl), RSA_get0_multi_prime_factors(3ssl), RSA_get0_multi_prime_crt_params(3ssl), RSA_set0_multi_prime_params(3ssl), RSA_get_version(3ssl) - Routines for getting and setting data in an RSA object
  TIFFFieldPassCount(3tiff) - get whether to pass a count to TIFFGetField/TIFFSetField
  TIFFFieldReadCount(3tiff) - get number of values to be read from field

Sorry for not answering your original question, but how could they dilute your ownership in the first company? Did you not have pre-emptive rights to also acquire more shares with the $1 price? Not sure how things work in the US.